[GeoStL] Re: gc.com-I absolutely HATE the new layout!!!!
- From: Dan Henke <thunder_monk@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
In answer to the question ...Yes I have tried the print with no logs and it
works however I like to print it with the first 5 or 6 logs as sometimes there
are hints or clues in those for an exceptionally difficult cache. I know I am
being stubborn but hey I have been a loyal customer of gc.com since almost the
very beginning including buying a premium membership every year...I think I get
the right to complain a bit :P....as for printing the .pdf file with logs it
seems to work ok but that means more button clicks to get there for each
page...and that little bit of extra time means a whole lot if you print 30 or
so cache pages out. Instead of complaining on here (sorry everyone) maybe I
need to send a complaint to the gc.com site and let them know what I really
think :P
Dan
--- On Mon, 7/28/08, Andrew Senger <asenger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Andrew Senger <asenger@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: gc.com-I absolutely HATE the new layout!!!!
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, July 28, 2008, 10:42 PM
-
I don't particularly like the new layout, either. Where companies are
going to sleeker looks, GC seemed to take a step back on the look.
I know that they've been talking about an updated version of the site
for over a year now. I'm assuming the new updates are headed that
way, and it's possible the layout is simply a default look with
possibilities of setting the looks up the way you want it to (similar
to a My Yahoo or My Google site).
I don't use printable sheets any more, but when I did, I used the "no
logs" PDF download to do such. Have those also changed with the
update, or do they look the same?
Andrew (all of yawetag; 1/3 of Team S.A.G.E.)
Andrew Senger
asenger@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.yawetag.net
"I can't win anything. In fact, if you look up 'loser' in the
dictionary, you'll see someone else's photo!" --Andrew Senger
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:55 PM, <szcue@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well after you said that John, I went in and hit the print simple no logs,
> but if you hit on the button that says short description, you will then
get
> the cache details, plus the map at the bottom of the page. That'll
work
> for now, I don't need logs to look for a cache! Thanks for the
advice.
> Thunder monk, are you reading this????? And like he said, way change for
> sake of change? I hope the updates and upgrades helps everyone else.
> Susie (1/2 of Quailman2).
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laurie Elfrank <lwatermann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 8:09 am
> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: gc.com-I absolutely HATE the new layout!!!!
>
> I believe what you now have to do is click on the "print (simple no
logs)"
> section on the cache page. When I did that, I eliminated the image and
> shrunk it down to get 2 pages on to 1. It printed out fine.
>
> If you try to print the screen and look at the preview then the border is
> included and it messes it all up.
>
> L Frank (John - Laurie's better half)
****************************************
For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
Other related posts:
