[GeoStL] Re: gc.com maps
- From: Jack Anderson <pandyandy3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 20:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
-
Yes the new maps were a lot better but they probably got swamped by complaints
from cachers who just do a copy and paste to put the info into a word document,
then what would happen was you would get about 30 or 40 copies of the maps and
have to delete them all to get it down to just one. A real pain in the you
know what.
It would have been better to teach the old fashioned people (like me) how to
do it the right way like you guys are teaching me at the GSAK class. Can't
wait for the next one.
Hey Bernie, when I was sitting right next to you at that class you had a
mapping program on your laptop that showed all of the caches on it. What was
the name of that program?
Jack
Bernie <happykraut@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-
Bummer---I liked the new maps a whole lot better. Bernie.
Eric East wrote: - I see that gc.com went back to the old map style on the
cache pages. I was getting to like the new ones. Eric
**************************************** For List Info or To make _ANY_
changes, including unsubscribing from this list, click ----->
//www.freelists.org/list/geocaching[1] Missouri Caches Scheduled to be
Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw[2]
--- Links ---
1 //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
2 http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
****************************************
For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
****************************************
For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
Other related posts:
