[GeoSTL] Re: deleted logs
- From: Paul Konopacki <konopapw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 18:24:17 -0500
For Jim (myotis), maintaining caches would be a fulltime
job!
I personally only have a handful of cache placements and
worry about them like children every night!
The letterbox we found in Forest Park a few days ago needed
maintenance and I noted that in my find log. I hesitated
making
it a 'should be archived' log type, but I was very close.
If I see
a number of logs over a period of a month or more where it
says the cache is trash or wet and the owner doesn't
respond,
I have no problem recommending it be archived. And believe
me, the geocaching.com admins KNOW when you enter a log
of that type.
Jim Bensman wrote:
> What I do not understand is why they don't just temporally
> disable the cache until they can fix it or put a message
> asking someone else to bring a replacement container the
> next time. That is what I do when I cannot take care of
> the problem myself in a reasonable amount of time.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Glenn
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 6:10 PM
> To: SLAGA
> Subject: [GeoSTL] deleted logs
>
> I found that my log entries from the letterboxes
> have been deleted. I guess they don?t like
> having cachers say that the stuff is soaked? I
> know we have some letterboxers here (I think) so
> no offence intended but come on, these caches
> are trash and have been trash. Isn?t there some
> sort of ?self policing? statute in the
> letterboxers code of conduct?
>
> Glenn
>
Other related posts:
