[GeoStL] Re: dangerous caches

  • From: Glenn <GLNash@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 09:00:12 -0600

-
well, this would be true.

gln

At 08:52 AM 1/22/2003 -0600, you wrote:
-
It's not the same kind of danger as Carondelet !!!


Barramus N 38° 25.081' W 90° 42.823'


----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn" <GLNash@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 8:46 AM Subject: [GeoStL] dangerous caches


> - > you will love Lunitic fringe, Hunters cave, Inspiration point, red bluff, > greens cave II, and most of butch's other caches. :-) > > dont slip > > At 05:17 AM 1/22/2003 -0800, you wrote: > >- > >.pntball the most dangerous caches we have been to > >so far is budder upper and titus hollow. > > > > >--- Mike Griffin <griff@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > - > > > This sounds like a group cache.. hehehehe :-) > > > > > > I think you should log this if you actually saw the > > > container. I have thought long and hard about this > > > and most people are right. If a person is honest > > > then they will stick to their ethics and a log > > > should be in order. If a person is just out there to > > > rack up numbers, then they will do that regardless. > > > > > > I would log it as a find. I would not go back. If no > > > one responds to the location to move it and interest > > > drops off, then perhaps it will be archived > > > anyways.. > > > > > > Cache on! > > > > > > Mike > > > The Brawny Bear > > > > > > > > > ---------- Original Message > > > ---------------------------------- > > > From: Michael Chambers <michaelc@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Reply-To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:11:04 -0600 > > > > > > >- > > > >Various members wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > >>I think it's up to the cache owner to say if you > > > can log it. What cache was it? > > > >>T.P.&M. > > > >> > > > >>if I don't sign the log I don't log it as a find. > > > ....... If the cache is in a dangerous spot I do > > > think the owner should be contacted. > > > >>Elkie > > > >> > > > >>Logging the find is up to you .... sounds like you > > > legitamately found it to me. Please let the owner > > > know of the situation, he might want to remove it. > > > I would want to know about it before going there. > > > >>Georgie > > > >> > > > >>I'd like to know which cache it is so I can avoid > > > going there. I'd say go ahead and log it just as > > > you would do some of the other public caches like > > > those in the zoo. It's definitly one I would not go > > > to. > > > >>Barramus > > > >> > > > >>IMHO, if you found it (and you did) you should log > > > it. I'd rather have someone do what you did than to > > > log it and show others where the cache is. If it is > > > not a big deal to come back when you can sign it, > > > you should. I see no problem with logging it if you > > > actually spot the container. > > > >> > > > >>Jim Bensman > > > >> > > > >>........you could have people logging caches that > > > they thought they saw when in actuality it was never > > > near. There is no way to ever know if they truly > > > found the cache. I think that that is part of the > > > challenge. To remove this would jeopardize the > > > integrity of the game. ......I feel that you could > > > return with someone to finish the cache. > > > >>Mike > > > >> > > > >>......you have asked a very good question that has > > > concerned me. Recently there was a cache that I > > > went to twice ( Jon's First Cache). I did not log it > > > as a find, because I did not retrieve it and sign > > > the log. I have also read posts that say they only > > > found part 1 of a multi-cache, but chose to log it > > > anyway, because they felt part 2 was missing? > > > .......others have posted finds, but said they > > > didn't have a pen to sign the log. I think each > > > person has to set their own standards and live with > > > it. I am only competing with myself. > > > >>John R - > > > >> > > > >>The kind of people who would log a cache as you > > > suggest will do it anyway and they would not ask a > > > group for advice. I don't log caches I don't sign or > > > find physically but if the situation arose where it > > > was dangerous to log it as is suggested in the > > > previous email and the cache had been seen just not > > > removed and logged in I would say "Yes go ahead and > > > log a find". > > > >>Dan (Thunder) > > > >> > > > >>I have had to go back to several caches more than > > > once to make it "right". > > > >>gln > > > >> > > > >>I bet it is that stinking Party Cove cache. I > > > just know it is. > > > >>gln > > > >> > > > >>Ya can't "reply" while on digest mode. > > > >>Barramus > > > >> > > > >Very excellent responses to my request for your > > > advise. I thank you all > > > >for your thoughts. I'll try to respond briefly. > > > >I did immediately email the cache owner with a copy > > > of my note to the > > > >List, and with a complete detailed description of > > > the exact cache > > > >location, so he (or she) could confirm that I did > > > indeed find it. I > > > >also asked them to move it. And yes, I actually > > > did see the cache > > > >itself. If I hadn't, I wouldn't have posed the > > > question with you all. > > > > I too went back twice to Jon's First, and know > > > that I found its hiding > > > >place, but I couldn't reach it either, so I didn't > > > log it - and I won't. > > > > Integrity and a strong code of personal ethics are > > > extremely important > > > >to me. If the owner contacts me and agrees that I > > > did find it, I'll > > > >think about logging it. There's a good chance that > > > I'll go back (mayby > > > >early on a cold morning - with my brother with me) > > > to make another > > > >attempt to actually log it, but I'll feel much > > > better about that if the > > > >owner moves it to a safer location. At first, I > > > had no intention of > > > >naming the cache, but several people have asked > > > which one it is - and > > > >have expressed a concern to avoid it, so I have > > > decided to let you all > > > >know that it is indeed the Carondelet cache (Sorry > > > Glen, it's not "that > > > >stinking Party Cove cache".). Oh! And yes, > > > Barramus, you can "reply" > > > >while on digest mode. It just takes a lot of > > > considerate editing to > > > >eliminate all the repetive BS. > > > > > > > >Thanks again, > > > >Leanman (Mike Chambers) > > > > > > > > > > > > >*************************************************************************** * > > > > Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com > > > > Mail List Info. > > > > > > > > >//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching > > > > > > > The SLAGA E-store is closed for image repairs but > > > this is what is there. > > > >The SLAGA E-store > > > http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/store.aspx?s=SLAGA > > > > > >*************************************************************************** * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >*************************************************************************** * > > > Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com > > > Mail List Info. > > > > > > > >//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching > > > > > > The SLAGA E-store is closed for image repairs but > > > this is what is there. > > > The SLAGA E-store > > > http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/store.aspx?s=SLAGA > > > > >*************************************************************************** * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >__________________________________________________ > >Do you Yahoo!? > >Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > >http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > **************************************************************************** > > Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com > > Mail List Info. > > //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching > > The SLAGA E-store is closed for image repairs but this is what is there. > >The SLAGA E-store http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/store.aspx?s=SLAGA > >*************************************************************************** * > > .:~*~:.:~*~:.:~*~:.:~*~:. > Glenn > St. Louis, Mo > > > **************************************************************************** > Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com > Mail List Info. > //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching > The SLAGA E-store is closed for image repairs but this is what is there. > The SLAGA E-store http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/store.aspx?s=SLAGA > **************************************************************************** > > > >


**************************************************************************** Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching The SLAGA E-store is closed for image repairs but this is what is there. The SLAGA E-store http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/store.aspx?s=SLAGA ****************************************************************************

.:~*~:.:~*~:.:~*~:.:~*~:. Glenn St. Louis, Mo


**************************************************************************** Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching The SLAGA E-store is closed for image repairs but this is what is there. The SLAGA E-store http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/store.aspx?s=SLAGA ****************************************************************************




Other related posts: