[GeoStL] Re: To delete or not to delete...opinions?
- From: Boyer Sidney <dsrat2000@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 19:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
I don't see any negative statements in his comments. It seems to be a
explanation of his preference not to sign them. I really don't see a problem
with his post.
--- On Sun, 5/8/11, Michael Rogers <mrogers07@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Michael Rogers <mrogers07@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [GeoStL] To delete or not to delete...opinions?
To: "SLAGA List" <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, May 8, 2011, 9:47 PM
Hey all. Some of my caches were found by this person today and all the logs
were pretty much like this. I understand some containers can be a pain for some
people, but still. So...should I just take this as it is or just delete the
logs? What would you personally do?
-Michael
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Geocaching" <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: May 8, 2011 3:07:13 PM CDT
To: mrogers07@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [LOG] Owner: XXXXXXX found "Doctor, Doctor!" - Columbia #5
(Traditional Cache)
You are receiving this email because you are the owner of this listing.
Location: Missouri, United States
jsmtech found "Doctor, Doctor!" - Columbia #5 (Traditional Cache) at 5/8/2011
Log Date: 5/8/2011
Figured a Sunday morning would be a good time to make a run at the Doctor,
Doctor caches. Nice and quiet with no muggles around. I didn’t sign the log.
These little guys are hard for me to handle and I always worry about dropping
the cap and losing it, so once I had discovered the container I replaced it and
moved on. Thanks for placing these! Good fun!
Other related posts:
