[GeoStL] The Smallest Champaign-Urbana Park Game RE: Re: Is this a Virtual cache that got slid under the radar as a Mystery?
- From: "Jim Bensman" <junkmailno@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 18:29:55 -0500
LOL at the lack of consistency on caches J
Come on, this one is simple! It only took me a couple of minutes to figure
it out. I opened the GIS shapefile the park district sent me and sorted by
size. They have not yet got to the smallest park. The smallest park in the
district is Stampofski Park; N40 06.984 W88 14.548; 331.8 sq ft or 31 sq
meters-1/9th the size of the smallest park found so far. To find the
current smallest park, save picture, right click, properties, details, and
scroll down to the lat and long (it's a georeferenced picture). To claim the
find, you go to the cords of the georeferenced picture (all you have to do
is save the picture on your Garmin GPS and then use whereto picture), take a
picture of your GPS, then go to Stampofski Park and take a picture. Simple!
Jim Bensman
"Nature Bats Last"
From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nathan Rover
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 4:02 PM
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Is this a Virtual cache that got slid under the radar
as a Mystery?
-
I've got two college degrees and reading that cache page and chain of logs
is so confusing I had to stop before I got a headache.
Kudos to Reviewer Jones for archiving that POS!
Following the directions to assemble IKEA furniture would be more enjoyable
then trying to log that cache.
-Nathan
(NateDawgCC)
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Gavin (darklighter) <knox1845@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In contrast to "The Smallest Champaign-Urbana Park Game", which was just
archived after two years of nobody finding the cache... because the owner
deemed it "irrelevant" and apparently removed it without informing anybody.
=)
http://coord.info/GCP57Y
--gavin
Other related posts:
