[GeoSTL] Re: Stashnotes
- From: GC-RGS <gc-rgs@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 23:39:04 -0500
What I was implying was the SLAGA members need some consistency. The member
(cache owner) can use whatever he wants for stashnote, member or not. SLAGA
would be a middleman for an agency to contact someone concerning a cache
placement without having to go through the different levels of Geocaching.com.
I wouldn't expect "non members" to use anything related to SLAGA.
I can only remember 3 or 4 instances in the past 8 months where the owner was
contacted for removal of a cache. These types request could be forwarded to
the respectful owner. Cachers would still contact the cache owners directly
thru Geocaching.com as they do now.
Rich
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Konopacki
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:02 PM
Subject: [GeoSTL] Re: Stashnotes
"If this container needs to be removed for any reason, please let us know by
contacting us at www.geostl.com ..."
Are these caches being placed under the stewardship of SLAGA? Who will they
be contacting at www.geostl.com? (you need an email address instead of a URL).
Won't they want to contact the cache owner, direct, or is SLAGA being set up as
the middleman? Not all cache owners are a member of SLAGA and I don't think we
want to be responsible for all caches that happen to mention us in a stashnote.
Unless we discuss this more, I'm afraid the webmaster is going to start
getting emails about cache issues that he had no right or desire to deal with!
GC-RGS wrote:
Has anyone put any thought into the standard "stashnotes" that we include
with our caches. Should we try to standardize something to include our SLAGA
info and website? Enclosed is what I'm including in a cache for tomorrow
(hopefully). I added the box at the top and changed the last paragraph for
SLAGA to be contacted if any problems with the cache. Rich
Other related posts:
