[GeoStL] Re: St. Louis County Park Closures

  • From: mike griffin <brawnybear@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 08:55:14 -0500

Susan, on Fox last night they had Charlie explaining that they needed to
cut operating costs and the best way to do that with the least impact was
the park system. Of course Walter Crawford was on too giving his point of
view about how important the parks are to not only the people who attend
but the wildlife as well. The operating costs of 1 park is very high. They
are considering cutting jobs along with park closings. However, if we can
offset operating costs of the parks, not all but just the ones that are
more popular, maybe that would keep a few on the list alive. Just thinking
out load here..

I know they can look deeper at other ways to cut, but logically, if they
can save jobs by closing parks, I don't think there's an argument. At a
point like this, you have to ask, "What would Ron Swanson do?"



On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Susan Ring <susanmring@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> At our new park (Lakeside 370) they just started charging a small fee (for
> nonresidents) for fishing or putting in a boat, with the money going toward
> park maintenance.  I asked the folks at the ranger station how it was going
> and they said great.  So apparently folks don't seem to mind the small fee
> for selected park services.
> About the park closings....
> I'm not sure that the intention is actually to find the money to keep the
> parks open.  I don't live in St. Louis County so I don't have a say, but
> those of you who do and who care about these parks  might want to take a
> look at this article.
> http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/article_44a771df-b9ed-507e-8b49-7bf8ec381d85.html
> I'm trying super hard not to touch on any kind of politics here on the
> list, but it's curious to me that the only items in the whole budget he
> could find  to cut are parks and snow removal.
> I can only speak for myself, but if I lived in the County I would be
> giving the appropriate folks in government an earful real quick.
> Susan
> On Nov 2, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Maggie Madonia wrote:
> I am not sure why they just don't consider charging
> a nominal fee especially for Lone Elk and George Winter.  Who wouldn't pay
> .50 to go to Lone Elk or launch a jet ski at George Winter.   (or to fish
> at Suson Park, maybe a yearly pass for a few bucks) I would versus losing
> these parks.
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Dan Baldenweck <harp8n@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>> St. Louis County is proposing closing some parks because of a budgetary
>> shortfall.  The list includes some of the biggies:  West Tyson,
>> Greensfelder, Lone Elk, Simpson...and many more.
>> Here's a map:
>> http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en&vpsrc=6&ctz=300&ie=UTF8&msa=0&msid=211388461394182029991.0004b0b1e3d928ccdeb1d&t=m&ll=38.659778,-90.43396&spn=0.53618,0.75531&z=10&source=embed

Other related posts: