[STL Geocaching] Re: Sleepless in Eureka

  • From: "Paul Becker" <pebecker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 18:20:30 -0600

Nice to meet you too.  My (our) handle is pebecker.  I know, not too creative.
Darla and I placed "Chain Mail" in Pacific.
Paul

----- Original Message -----
From: "Barramus" <barramus@xxxxxxx>
To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 6:24 PM
Subject: [STL Geocaching] Re: Sleepless in Eureka


> Glad to meet you Paul, didn't know you were out this way.
> What's your handle ? PB ?
> I was joking actually, I know who posted that msg.
>
> Barramus
> N   38° 25.081'
> W 90° 42.823'
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Becker" <pebecker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 6:12 PM
> Subject: [STL Geocaching] Re: Sleepless in Eureka
>
>
> Must be three then.  Darla and I are here, and we didn't send it.
> Paul
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Barramus" <barramus@xxxxxxx>
> To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 6:17 PM
> Subject: [STL Geocaching] Re: Sleepless in Eureka
>
>
> > First off let me say Bearramus has been found and is safely tucked away at
> > Sterling.
> >
> > I've read this post before, lets see, we have two geocachers in Eureka
> that
> > I know of and I'm one of them.  So that leaves....
> >
> > I never did see any replies to it though.
> >
> > Barramus
> > N   38° 25.081'
> > W 90° 42.823'
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Glenn Nash" <GLNash@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "St. Louis Geocachers MailList" <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 6:01 PM
> > Subject: [STL Geocaching] Sleepless in Eureka
> >
> >
> > Here is something just in from an anonomouse sender. Sleepless raises some
> > important issues that could stand a little discussing. Among them are
> length
> > of a cache life and what are appropriate saturations levels for cache
> > numbers. ANY THOUGHTS so  Sleepless can get a little rest?
> >
> > glenn
> > -------- original message ---------------
> >
> >
> > Ranger Rick - Wasn't that the raccoon mascot for an elementary school
> > environment magazine? (http://www.nwf.org/kids/). Here's someone who was
> > affected in a political way by Ranger Rick:
> > (http://eserver.org/bs/29/bertsch.html): ... When I perceive a threat to
> > something I care about, my first impulse is to make it into a park ...
> >
> > I'm in a cynical mood. This, despite the fact that finding two new caches
> > today gave me a personal goal I could be proud of. I'm still energized by
> > the hunts and can't seem to get the sport out of my mind (although, I
> can't
> > hold a candle to Glen, Denali and BruceS!). This morning, I ordered (6)
> ammo
> > boxes over the internet whose sole purpose is to be used for new caches.
> The
> > problem is - where do/can I put them?
> >
> > The number of public areas in the St. Louis vicinity that don't already
> have
> > a cache planted, in or near them, are few. You could argue that more than
> > one cache can share an area, but I've seen people whine that some caches
> are
> > 'too close together'. There is no denying the fact that saturation is
> > inevitable and can be an issue, but I don't think St. Louis has reached
> that
> > point ... yet.
> >
> > The people who complain that caches are 'too close together' are not the
> > ones who visit the more remote areas. But I have to say, I haven't seen
> too
> > many caches retired/archived, either. A question to those who have been in
> > the sport longer, or have read the GroundSpeak newsgroups: When should a
> > cache be archived?
> >
> > I'm not thrilled by the recent news that St. Louis caches are going to be
> > confiscated when rangers happen to be in the vicinity. For the sake of the
> > safety of humanity (by whose edict?), is the sport going to degrade to
> > finding coupons at 4x4 posts in the woods that can be redeemed for a Big
> > Gulp at Seven-11? What will be come of the rubic's cube keyring and the
> > Where's George dollar?!
> >
> > Signed,
> > Sleepless in Eureka
> >
> > *************************************************************
> > Our WebPage!   //www.freelists.org/webpage/geocaching
> > Mail List & Archive Info.
> > //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
> > Environmental msg. of the day, "Save the spotted Cow"
> > *************************************************************
> >
> >
> > *************************************************************
> > Our WebPage!   //www.freelists.org/webpage/geocaching
> > Mail List & Archive Info.
> > //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
> > Environmental msg. of the day, "Save the spotted Cow"
> > *************************************************************
>
> *************************************************************
> Our WebPage!   //www.freelists.org/webpage/geocaching
> Mail List & Archive Info.
> //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
> Environmental msg. of the day, "Save the spotted Cow"
> *************************************************************
>
> *************************************************************
> Our WebPage!   //www.freelists.org/webpage/geocaching
> Mail List & Archive Info.
> //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
> Environmental msg. of the day, "Save the spotted Cow"
> *************************************************************

*************************************************************
Our WebPage!   //www.freelists.org/webpage/geocaching
Mail List & Archive Info. 
//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
Environmental msg. of the day, "Save the spotted Cow"
*************************************************************

Other related posts: