Now is this the same kind of problem? How many cachers can live in the same city? <:) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barramus" <barramus@xxxxxxx> To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 6:17 PM Subject: [STL Geocaching] Re: Sleepless in Eureka > First off let me say Bearramus has been found and is safely tucked away at > Sterling. > > I've read this post before, lets see, we have two geocachers in Eureka that > I know of and I'm one of them. So that leaves.... > > I never did see any replies to it though. > > Barramus > N 38° 25.081' > W 90° 42.823' > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Glenn Nash" <GLNash@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "St. Louis Geocachers MailList" <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 6:01 PM > Subject: [STL Geocaching] Sleepless in Eureka > > > Here is something just in from an anonomouse sender. Sleepless raises some > important issues that could stand a little discussing. Among them are length > of a cache life and what are appropriate saturations levels for cache > numbers. ANY THOUGHTS so Sleepless can get a little rest? > > glenn > -------- original message --------------- > > > Ranger Rick - Wasn't that the raccoon mascot for an elementary school > environment magazine? (http://www.nwf.org/kids/). Here's someone who was > affected in a political way by Ranger Rick: > (http://eserver.org/bs/29/bertsch.html): ... When I perceive a threat to > something I care about, my first impulse is to make it into a park ... > > I'm in a cynical mood. This, despite the fact that finding two new caches > today gave me a personal goal I could be proud of. I'm still energized by > the hunts and can't seem to get the sport out of my mind (although, I can't > hold a candle to Glen, Denali and BruceS!). This morning, I ordered (6) ammo > boxes over the internet whose sole purpose is to be used for new caches. The > problem is - where do/can I put them? > > The number of public areas in the St. Louis vicinity that don't already have > a cache planted, in or near them, are few. You could argue that more than > one cache can share an area, but I've seen people whine that some caches are > 'too close together'. There is no denying the fact that saturation is > inevitable and can be an issue, but I don't think St. Louis has reached that > point ... yet. > > The people who complain that caches are 'too close together' are not the > ones who visit the more remote areas. But I have to say, I haven't seen too > many caches retired/archived, either. A question to those who have been in > the sport longer, or have read the GroundSpeak newsgroups: When should a > cache be archived? > > I'm not thrilled by the recent news that St. Louis caches are going to be > confiscated when rangers happen to be in the vicinity. For the sake of the > safety of humanity (by whose edict?), is the sport going to degrade to > finding coupons at 4x4 posts in the woods that can be redeemed for a Big > Gulp at Seven-11? What will be come of the rubic's cube keyring and the > Where's George dollar?! > > Signed, > Sleepless in Eureka > > ************************************************************* > Our WebPage! //www.freelists.org/webpage/geocaching > Mail List & Archive Info. > //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching > Environmental msg. of the day, "Save the spotted Cow" > ************************************************************* > > > ************************************************************* > Our WebPage! //www.freelists.org/webpage/geocaching > Mail List & Archive Info. > //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching > Environmental msg. of the day, "Save the spotted Cow" > ************************************************************* ************************************************************* Our WebPage! //www.freelists.org/webpage/geocaching Mail List & Archive Info. //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching Environmental msg. of the day, "Save the spotted Cow" *************************************************************