[GeoStL] Re: SLAGA awards

  • From: "Mike Griffin" <griff@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 21:32:03 -0500

Ditto! Sounds like a great idea!
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bridget E. Griffin 
  To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 3:37 PM
  Subject: [GeoStL] Re: SLAGA awards


  You have been thinking about this.  You've got some good ideas and it all 
sounds great!  

   

  Bridget

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom
  Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 3:20 PM
  To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [GeoStL] Re: SLAGA awards

   

  Yes, I realize that food is a whole lot more important than creating awards. 
I also expect people to think about this a little bit. I really was trying to 
get the ear of our SLAGA officers and get their opinions on the subject, as 
well as the general SLAGA membership. I am also out of town this weekend 
without internet access until Sunday night. But, I thought I would start a 
general discussion on the subject. I would think you could cast a vote for any 
which were on the ballot, whether you found it or not. Personally, I would only 
vote for the ones I visited (found or DNF...and maybe placed).

   

  My thoughts about these awards (SLAGA Smiley Awards?):

  1. All nominations must be for caches placed within the SLAGA territory. They 
do not have to be newly placed caches...any cache is eligible.

  2. Any registered member (contributing or standard) of SLAGA may vote for one 
nominated cache in each of nine categories. (Categories are listed below.)

  3. Nominations would be taken beginning with the Fall meeting/picnic (end of 
September) and last for 6 weeks.

  4. Voting would commence once the nominations are closed and the candidate 
caches are published. Voting would be open for a period of 4 weeks.

  5. Awards could be presented at a special meeting in January.

  6. Caches will be eligible to be nominated and eligible to win in more than 
one catergory. Once a cache has won a Smiley Award it will not be eligible to 
be nominated in that catergory again. It would be eligible to be nominated in 
catergories in which it has not won.

   

  The categories will be: Traditional, Multi, and Puzzle/Mystery caches.

  The awards in each category will be for: Most Creative, Most Difficult, Best 
Liked.

  This makes a total of nine (9) awards.

   

  My thoughts on the subject. And yes, I realize that just by bringing up the 
idea I probably would be tagged with organizing and running it. I might agree.

   

  Lobocs (Tom)

  tnsl <sydstyr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Don't be surprised if it takes a few hours to get more responses -- they're 
all eating right now you know and it takes a while for everything to digest. 
But no, there aren't awards (but start the conversation and it's a darn good 
way to get yourself set up to start the organizing of something heh-heh)

     

    I think it sounds like a fun idea. For the last year we've  really only 
been able to cache as a way to get to know an area as we travel and I AM 
influenced by logos, "awards" and other interesting things on a cache page.   I 
assume that if someone is taking that much care to promote their organization 
then they've (hopefully) taken that much care with creating a cache.  SLAGA 
could keep a list on the website and also provide something for the owners to 
put on their webpage. Could be fun

     

    How did they decide who could vote on a cache?  can you only vote on one 
that you found? hunted and didn't find but logged a DNF? have heard about? etc? 
 We like details this group .. 

     

    Nancy

     

     

       

    


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing. 

Other related posts: