[GeoStL] Quiet.. and Virtual caches
- From: Glenn <GLNash@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:56:39 -0600
-
I am surprised at the total lack of activity here today. I been sitting
here waiting for something to happen and it is just dead. I have
been having a discussion about Virtual caches (VC's) as i am a little
kornfused with them now. see below:
- Question to the Forums:
- I am following along OK with the VC thing. VC points I need to get
clear on:
- It is stated that a "real" cache is always
preferable but in some high traffic areas or terrorist target places, a VC may work.
- BUT: these high traffic areas are end up being the "drive by " areas and the "drive by caches" aren't any good either.
- Now, applying all the various rules i have at my disposal, I can disallow a VC anywhere on the planet, even in the NPS (National parks service) because i can create an offset and refer to another place with in the park land.
- That being the case, I am wondering if they would *ever* be appropriate but I cant think of where they would be now. (I even have a VC that i suppose is very lame :-0 )
- Shouldn't we just ban them? NO!!! We need them!!! ... For something... I suppose.
- I have really gotten myself tricked up with these dam things.
- Help?
- gln
-----------------------
Comments? Discuss amongst yourselves...
gln
---------------------
Glenn
St. Louis, Mo
****************************************************************************
Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com
Mail List Info.
//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
****************************************************************************
Other related posts:
