[GeoStL] Re: Questions on the SLAGA "New Caches" page

  • From: Glenn <Glenn@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 15:34:44 -0600

-
Unless you cc: the Webmaster Consultant Kono, he will not see these comments as he is not a member of slaga and is nor subbed to this email list.


glenn


At 03:12 PM 3/18/2003 -0600, Jen Guyer wrote:

"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word">

>> thought that on the New Cachespage, there used to be a column that showed the Citythat the cache was located in/near. ...... The Descriptioncolumn is extremely truncated, it doesnt offer much help either. <<

I agree. I like the old format of this page better. The city/park feature was really nice. And while I don't think the description needs to be really long (I was happy with the length it was), now it is just cut half the time. If it is a "new cache" page, shouldn't it be new caches? Why is there a need for status and archived info? Is this a merging of new and archived cache pages? This just seems like more info, but less info we can use.

Jen

---------------- Glenn The SLAGA Mail, Membership & GC.com admin guy


****************************************************************************
Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching ****************************************************************************





Other related posts: