[GeoStL] Re: Number of Caches
- From: Mary Beth Gianoli <marybeth.gianoli@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:59:21 -0500
That would be very exciting!
-mb
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:24 PM, mike griffin <brawnybear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That one web cam cache is BWATs. I think it might be the last one in all of
> Missouri.
>
> Thanks CW and Nate for the numbers. I have finished the proposal and will
> hand deliver it to the powers at GeoWoodstock in a few weeks. Hopefully, we
> will host in 2013 or 2014!!
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Nathan Rover <nrover@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> -
>>
>> Sorry math was off a little GSAK shows 4 numbers (found, un-found,
>> unavailable, and your hides) I was adding all the numbers, I guess there can
>> be repeats between found and unavailable.
>>
>> 50mile = 2461 (Available) + 51 (Temporarily Unavailable) = 2512 Total
>> 100mile = 5066 (Available) + 86 (Temporarily Unavailable) = 5152 Total
>>
>> With in 50mi 100mi
>> Traditional = 2133 4516
>> Multi = 171 258
>> Letterbox = 7 8
>> CITO = 1 1
>> Event = 4 8
>> Virtual = 15 33
>> Web Cam = 1 1
>> Mystery = 152 268
>> Earth = 23 52
>> Wherigo = 5 7
>>
>> That's enough fun with numbers for now... after seeing those number, I
>> guess I need to go get that one web cam cache...
>>
>> -Nathan
>> (NateDawgCC)
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Nathan Rover <nrover@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> -
>>>
>>> Also, that's not a guess, I have every cache in the state of Missouri and
>>> Illinois in my GSAK, and they are updated at least once a week.
>>>
>>> -Nathan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Nathan Rover <nrover@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> -
>>>>
>>>> 50 miles = 2464 (Available) + 102 (temporarily Unavailable) = 2566
>>>> Total
>>>> 100 miles = 5070 (Available) + 176 (temporarily Unavailable) = 5246
>>>> Total
>>>>
>>>> If you want I can get you breakdown by type also. or other distances.
>>>>
>>>> -Nathan
>>>> (NateDawgCC)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:03 PM, mike griffin <brawnybear@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I need help with a proposal. Is there a way that I can determine the
>>>>> number of caches in a radius from the arch? I need a ballpark, fairly
>>>>> accurate, number of caches in a 50 mile and 100 mile radius from the arch.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know a PQ gets me 1000 but I need more!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Brawny Bear
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
We could learn a lot from crayons:
some are sharp, some are pretty, some are dull, some have weird names, and
all are different colors ...
but they all have to learn to live in the same box.
Other related posts:
