- I have to agree with you on smoking. I think instead of states banning smoking, they should give tax breaks to businesses that are completely non-smoking. A bar doesn't have to be non-smoking, but the owner knows that the non-smoking one next door is paying less to the government because of it. I've worked in a casino for over five years. Three of it was in Guest Safety (Security), where a majority of my day was spent dealing with the "bad" guests. In those three years, I personally placed five people in handcuffs and eventually arrested three of them for assault. Those three were intoxicated. It's my experience that drunks are worse than smokers. Why don't we make drinking in public places illegal? Andrew (yawetag) P.S. I know, I know... drinking doesn't directly harm the person next to you. It's also my experience that almost all smokers are polite enough to stop when you ask. If not, there are scores of other slot machines, table games, bars, casinos, and restaurants. P.P.S. I'm a non-smoker, too. ----- Original Message ----- From: "RNX" <_rnx_@xxxxxxx> To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 9:17 PM Subject: [GeoStL] Re: NGR: Conceal and Carry [snip] I believe that smoking is a health hazard and smokers should be considerate. Smokers should avoid smoking in high traffic areas. Does that mean that all public places should be non-smoking? Butts are litter and first and second hand smoke is hazardous but do we cross the line when we tell business owners that they must prohibit smoking? Wouldn't the free market take care of that. Don't patronize an establishment that allows smoking if you find it offensive. If enough people join your boycott then the business will fail. [snip] **************************************** For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw