- I have been using the "nearest cache" and search page functions for a while. they are very nice.. gln At 09:49 PM 6/14/2003 -0500, Paul Konopacki wrote: >- >GEOSTL.COM DOWN >* geostl.com was down for hours yesterday and I have no idea why. I >didn't do anything to get it back; it just came back. > >GEOCACHING.COM DOWN >* geocaching.com was down for hours a few days ago. It's hard to find out >'official' explanations from groundspeak on why these outages occur (or >even what changes are being made and when they get made). I suppose I >don't deserve to know all that is going on with the site, despite my >curiosity. History shows that groundspeak holds their cards close to the >cuff. However, I discovered some juicy information about what they are up >to (see below). > > >GEOCACHING.COM CHANGES AND LOCATIONLESS CACHES >* Below is an excerpt from a message from Jeremy in a groundspeak thread >about locationless caches. I was more curious about what he lists as >their web development priorities, but his view on the status of >locationless caches is also somewhat interesting to know. (Personally, I >do without locationless). > > >Jeremy say: > >"They'll be back. With limited staff to complete the new site quickly (and >with limited bugs in a release) we're spending longer than initially >planned. Our priorities at the moment are: > >1. Speed up the existing site to support double growth over the last few >months. Right now I'm working to improve the speed of the nearest cache >page (the most resource-heavy) >2. Completely replace the map server. >3. Introduce Geocaching.com Gen 2, which is more feature-rich and fast, >incorporating many of the recommendations made over the past 2 years to >improve the web site. >4. Mystery projects for Premium Members. > >Some of these projects are going on concurrently, and some (like >locationless caches) are backburnered until the more important items are >completed. > >I find locationless caches of monumental importance and have a lot of >ideas on how to make them more fun and manageable. Trust me that we will >not abandon them, but we need more time to get these projects listed above >so we have a healthy base to complete the locationless cache features." > > > **************************************************************************** > Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com > Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching > Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html > **************************************************************************** >To unsubscribe from this list: > send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in > the Subject field ---------------- Glenn **************************************************************************** Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html **************************************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list: send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field