[GeoStL] Re: Misc geocaching stuff

  • From: Glenn <Glenn@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 21:55:17 -0500

-

I have been using the "nearest cache" and search page functions for a 
while. they are very nice..

gln


At 09:49 PM 6/14/2003 -0500, Paul Konopacki wrote:
>-
>GEOSTL.COM DOWN
>* geostl.com was down for hours yesterday and I have no idea why.  I 
>didn't do anything to get it back; it just came back.
>
>GEOCACHING.COM DOWN
>* geocaching.com was down for hours a few days ago.  It's hard to find out 
>'official' explanations from groundspeak on why these outages occur (or 
>even what changes are being made and when they get made).  I suppose I 
>don't deserve to know all that is going on with the site, despite my 
>curiosity.  History shows that groundspeak holds their cards close to the 
>cuff.  However, I discovered some juicy information about what they are up 
>to (see below).
>
>
>GEOCACHING.COM CHANGES AND LOCATIONLESS CACHES
>* Below is an excerpt from a message from Jeremy in a groundspeak thread 
>about locationless caches.  I was more curious about what he lists as 
>their web development priorities, but his view on the status of 
>locationless caches is also somewhat interesting to know.  (Personally, I 
>do without locationless).
>
>
>Jeremy say:
>
>"They'll be back. With limited staff to complete the new site quickly (and 
>with limited bugs in a release) we're spending longer than initially 
>planned. Our priorities at the moment are:
>
>1. Speed up the existing site to support double growth over the last few 
>months. Right now I'm working to improve the speed of the nearest cache 
>page (the most resource-heavy)
>2. Completely replace the map server.
>3. Introduce Geocaching.com Gen 2, which is more feature-rich and fast, 
>incorporating many of the recommendations made over the past 2 years to 
>improve the web site.
>4. Mystery projects for Premium Members.
>
>Some of these projects are going on concurrently, and some (like 
>locationless caches) are backburnered until the more important items are 
>completed.
>
>I find locationless caches of monumental importance and have a lot of 
>ideas on how to make them more fun and manageable. Trust me that we will 
>not abandon them, but we need more time to get these projects listed above 
>so we have a healthy base to complete the locationless cache features."
>
>
>  ****************************************************************************
>  Our WebPage!  Http://WWW.GeoStL.com
>  Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
>  Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html
>  ****************************************************************************
>To unsubscribe from this list:
>  send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in 
> the Subject field

----------------
Glenn


 ****************************************************************************
 Our WebPage!  Http://WWW.GeoStL.com  
 Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
 Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html 
 ****************************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list:
 send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the 
Subject field




Other related posts: