@Nathan - Rookie. Okra. From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nathan Rover Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 4:02 PM To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Is this a Virtual cache that got slid under the radar as a Mystery? - I've got two college degrees and reading that cache page and chain of logs is so confusing I had to stop before I got a headache. Kudos to Reviewer Jones for archiving that POS! Following the directions to assemble IKEA furniture would be more enjoyable then trying to log that cache. -Nathan (NateDawgCC) On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Gavin (darklighter) <knox1845@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:knox1845@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: In contrast to "The Smallest Champaign-Urbana Park Game", which was just archived after two years of nobody finding the cache... because the owner deemed it "irrelevant" and apparently removed it without informing anybody. =) http://coord.info/GCP57Y --gavin On Apr 1, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Glenn wrote: As I explained last night, it is not a virtual, there is a box with a logbook on location. It has al additional logging requirement of sending the owner some info. They are listed as a mystery cache. These were common back in the day. In'09 the ALR's were discontinued and were supposed to be removed. In any event, the only thing that needs to be done to claim a fund is find the box. The sending of names is optional. I left a note on the page last night after you pointed me in that direction. If the owner refuses to change the page it will be archived after a while. It does not look like any logs were ever deleted for not sending the info. Via iP-4 On Mar 31, 2011, at 7:03 PM, Michael Rogers <mrogers07@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mrogers07@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: I am planning a trip to KC in the near future and I came across this cache. To me, it seems like a Virtual submitted as a Mystery. Am I wrong in thinking this? http://coord.info/GC14C1J