[GeoStL] Re: Fw: SLAGA July Email Blast for ...
- From: "Bridget E. Griffin" <Bridget.Griffin@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 08:55:04 -0500
LOL!! That was a good one! Hehehe
Bridget (still laughing!)
________________________________
From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of tnsl
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 11:41 PM
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Fw: SLAGA July Email Blast for ...
Nominating ended June 30th? and nominees have a month to decide if they
want to run or not?
Could we know which ones took a full month to make this decision? It
could be an indication of how things would run if that person is or is
not elected. heh heh
Nancy
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Bromley <mailto:bromley@xxxxxxx>
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 10:09 PM
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Fw: SLAGA July Email Blast for ...
Bridget,
We've asked all nominees to let us know of their intentions by
July 30th. The ballot should be sent out via email by the 15th of
August. Since there will be no voting at the fall picnic this year, the
elections will close by September 15th. At that point, the votes will
be counted, verified and the winners announced one week before the
picnic. We'll conduct the business meeting (my final duty) and
introduce the new officers at that time.
Steve
On 07/05/2008 9:49:27 PM, Bridget E. Griffin
(bridget.griffin@xxxxxxxx) wrote:
> When will the ballot be released? Before the fall picnic?
>
> Bridget
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Jim Greene
> Sent: Fri 7/4/2008 7:11 PM
> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Fw: SLAGA July Email Blast for ...
>
> -
> We have great nominations for all positions, but there
> won't be any
> announcements until the ballot is released. Until everybody
has been
> heard from, I know there won't
> be any preliminary announcements.
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:02 PM, tnsl <sydstyr@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> >
> > From the email blast ...
> >
> " So far, we've had several excellent candidates step up to
run for
> > President this year. At this point, we still have
nominations outstanding
> > that haven't been accepted or declined. "
> >
> >
> > Is it illegal? unethical? or not allowed to know who has
accepted what
> > nominations/for what positions etc before we find out on a
ballot? If
> we
> > know what offices don't have nominations we may be able to
take care of
> > that.
> >
> > Nancy
> >
> >
>
>
> **
<http://ts.msgtag.net/avB/FFo/bFEClt/CaDaiuAkgxB/DpFAD/lCAw.gif> It's
not only the destination, but the path you take and the friends you make
along the way.
Other related posts:
