[GeoStL] Re: Fake Log Entry??

  • From: "Hobbit Taz" <HobbitTaz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 17:20:47 -0500

Normally I do a cut and past with a general description of why I was in the
area, or who I was with, or special items such as storms in the area,  fresh
snowfall or so forth.  Then add a small note with each about the specific
cache (sometimes long note if there was something special).  However, more
often these days - doing 15 Park-N-Grab for a Micro film canister stuck at
the bottom of a sign in just another cross road with nothing particularly
different than the last one, Its difficult to say too much.  




From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Libby Morehead
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 12:20 PM
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Fake Log Entry??



I send from my iPad but I write a traditional log. And it is not a "cut and
paste". Those are an aggravation sometimes. 



Sent from my iPad

On Oct 6, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Rick Rouse <rrouse2@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I vote for traditional logs - I meet more people that way & of course it's a
main stay of the game.

Rick Rouse -

Sent from my iPod

On Oct 6, 2010, at 11:30 AM, "ehamemail" < <mailto:sydstyr@xxxxxxxxx>
sydstyr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I've been on Facebook too long...  I'm looking for the "like" button.

(Not that I have any new caches or anything ..  just sayin')



----- Original Message ----- 

From: Bob <mailto:cachefinder@xxxxxxxxxxx>  TheCacher Subject: [GeoStL] Re:
Fake Log Entry??


Maybe if we (cache owners) delete this type of log entry (Sent from my
mobile device etc.) the (alleged) cache finder will provide a more
traditional log.  After all, the only reward we get in placing caches is the
actual log entry.  I like it when they at least tell me that the cache is in
good shape or needs something.  
Just my opinion.

Other related posts: