[GeoStL] Re: Changes for the new year.
- From: Craig Ingram <seaeye@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:59:50 -0800 (PST)
-
One more question
Generally, how long is a cycle?
--- On Fri, 1/9/09, Mike Griffin <griff@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Mike Griffin <griff@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Changes for the new year.
> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Friday, January 9, 2009, 10:48 PM
> -
> OK, a couple of questions...
>
> Once a cache is disabled by the owner, how long do we have
> to fix it?
>
> If someone posts an Archive note on someones cache, does
> that count as a 1
> note?
>
> Since it is only a 1 note cycle, does that mean you will
> archive it if you
> don't hear back, or will you archive it regardless
> after the first note.
>
> Today, I enabled 3 caches that had 4 no finds or more. Each
> cache was there,
> logs dry. I was afraid I was going to get
> a note disabling the cache from you guys because one was
> over 1 week. The
> Shed took me 2 weeks to get the parts I needed to replace
> it.
> I know you said there would be exceptions, I'm just
> imagining that people
> will just archive it rather than deal with it if the time
> to fix it is
> shortened
> too much.
>
> Mike
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Glenn Nash"
> <glenn.geocachingadmin@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "SLAGA" <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 7:34 PM
> Subject: [GeoStL] Changes for the new year.
>
>
> -
>
> I have a long story but i am waiting for it to come back
> from the
> editors.
>
> DISABLED CACHES :
> Long story short, we will no longer have the customary
> "Three note
> cycle" in dealing with disabled caches. The cycle will
> move to a ONE
> note cycle. I have seen other reviewers use a 2 week
> cycle. Two
> weeks seems a little short to me. It takes me longer than
> that for
> find my GPS.
>
> Typically, people that maintain their caches do so very
> quickly. Those
> that don't repair quickly never do. I could wait for 6
> note cycles
> and it will not make any difference.
>
> Caches that are victims of forces beyond anyones control
> will be
> archived and can be renewed when the problems are resolved.
>
> There will always be exceptions and we will deal with them
> when they
> come up.
>
> See, this was nicer than the 4 pages I started off with.
>
> Pass the word.
>
> Your friendly Missouri Geocache Review team,
> Glenn (*gln) & Reviewer of the Cache (RotC)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ****************************************
> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including
> unsubscribing from this
> list, click ----->
> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived
> http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
> Missouri land use policies --> www.MoCache.net
> Mogeo forums -->http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php
> "NGR LIST" -->
> //www.freelists.org/list/mga
>
>
>
> ****************************************
> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including
> unsubscribing from this
> list, click ----->
> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived
> http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
> Missouri land use policies --> www.MoCache.net
> Mogeo forums -->http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php
> "NGR LIST" -->
> //www.freelists.org/list/mga
****************************************
For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
Missouri land use policies --> www.MoCache.net
Mogeo forums -->http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php
"NGR LIST" --> //www.freelists.org/list/mga
Other related posts:
