[GeoStL] Re: Caches screwed into trees?

  • From: Jason Collier <jcollier@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:48:03 -0600

That actually gives the trees more CO2 to soak up. :)

Jason Collier

On 1/3/2012 3:42 PM, Maggie Madonia wrote:
I wonder if driving around from cache to cache hurts more than a nail? Now my head hurts...


On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Craig <seaeye@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:seaeye@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    As a student of horticulture and landscape design Bernie is 150%
    right leave the trees that are living alone. Any bark intrusion
    can open the tree up to infection, infestation and possible death.
    The bark of the tree serves the same purpose as the skin on your
    body. I have to disagree with what the rangers have said to Bob. I
    can see there was smoke being blown in several of their
    statements, probably so they didn't look uninformed. SO beating
    nails into, screwing screws into, no matter how small or how
    stainless or what season it is, or even banding around living
    trees goes directly against the Geocaching rules of leave no
    tracks or traces and will directly affect the health of a
    perfectly healthy tree. So I agree with Bernie, LEAVE THE LIVING

    On Tue Jan 03 10:58:58 CST 2012, Bernie Ver Hey
    <Happykraut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Happykraut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    > To make a real long story short. Leave the trees alone. Who can
    > remember all
    > this and who would even pay attention to it.  Bernie
    >  From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    > [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Bob
    > TheCacher
    > Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 10:33 AM
    > To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    > Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Caches screwed into trees?
    >  Ok, here's the whole story that was given to me by a couple of
    > Rangers:  It
    > all depends on the type of tree and the time of year that a
    > nail/screw is
    > put into a tree.  Ash trees are the most resilient and can take a
    > lot of
    > foreign objects in them.  Next is the pine/evergreen variety
    > which is second
    > in line and can tolerate a lot also.  Then Oaks are pretty good
    > at taking
    > the "spike".  I don't remember what was after that except that
    > the least
    > tolerant was the Dogwood. But who would use a Dogwood anyway.
    > The second
    > issue is the time of year.  When the sap is running more quickly,
    > as in the
    > summer, the tree can plug itself up quickly and protect itself.
    > During the
    > winter months is the worst as the sap doesn't flow fast and takes
    > more time
    > to seal. Leaving it prone to infection longer.
    > One more variable the park rangers told me was the thickness of
    > the bark.
    > The thicker the bark the better.  I suppose this may go back to
    > the type of
    > tree being 'nailed' and the ability to seal up.   So pick a thick
    > bark tree
    > in the summer and use a nail/screw that won't rust (another
    > variable).
    > Bob
    >   _____  Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 20:36:01 -0800
    > From: jennyann1975@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jennyann1975@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    > Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Caches screwed into trees?
    > To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    > Yeah I agree. I work for a company that supplies products for
    > lawn care
    > companies and yes it only takes one nail hole to leave the tree
    > open to
    > infection.
    > I love bird houses caches but there are ways to secure the bird
    > house
    > without nailing into the tree or drilling a hole. I cringe every
    > time I come
    > across one nailed to a tree.
    > Yeah I know we all grew up with tree houses etc with the trees
    > surviving
    > nails etc, but times are changing and tree diseases are more
    > prevalent today
    > then they were twenty years ago. Jenny
    > thesapafamily
    > No virus found in this message.
    > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
    > Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4720 - Release Date:
    > 01/03/12

For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes to your account, including unsubscribing from this list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching

Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived  http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
Missouri Geocaching land policies --> http://tinyurl.com/lgyy84
Missouri Geocachers Forums -->  http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php
Missouri Geocachers Calendar --->  

Other related posts: