[GeoStL] Re: Branson Caching

  • From: "Gale R. Nie" <showme69@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:08:08 -0500

Are you kidding?  Franklin County has been rated tops in meth many times. My 
parents live in a nice newer neighborhood in Washington, lots of duplexes with 
retirees. I believe it was last year when a lab was busted just a couple of 
blocks from them. Unfortunately, the meth heads can pop up just about anywhere. 
 And I've never left my front door unlocked. Heck, my brother had his bike 
stolen off our front porch in the early '70s on 8th Street in Washington.  It's 
nice out here but not that nice.
Gale
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: HoosierDaddy 
  To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 6:37 PM
  Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Branson Caching


  - we all make choices that have consequences. just keep in mind all the 
privlidges that living in Washington provides to keep your minds off the other 
troubles. i bet you can leave you front door unlocked without the fear of a 
crackhead walking through it and stealing your melba toast. No DSL is a small 
price to pay for that kind of peace of mind. 


  ------ Original Message ------ 
  Received: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:14:15 PM EDT 
  From: "Tim and Pam" <timpam2mocachers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
  To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
  Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Branson Caching 



  It’s not our fault we are stuck in the dark ages. We have talked and talked 
to AT&T about getting DSL out in Washington/Krakow area and they just don’t 
think it’s important. Yes we can get satellite but we refuse to pay $60.00 @ 
month. So if any works for AT&T and they can help get the phone system updated 
out here please do so! Heck our phone went out last week Thursday and since we 
live in Franklin county we had to wait 48 hours for them to fix it. 

    

    

  Tim 

    

  www.tueltzen.smugmug.com 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of HoosierDaddy 
  Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 4:23 PM 
  To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Branson Caching 

    


  My sincerest appology to all those internet users who are still in the dark 
ages. I live and work in a world where we push terabits/sec of data around the 
globe. I frequently forget that there are users out there trying to read e-mail 
on their Apple 2+ and/or IBM PCjr over a 13.3K modem. I will make your problem 
my problem. 

  "will the highways of the internet become more few?" - W 

  ------ Original Message ------ 
  Received: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:59:52 PM EDT 
  From: "Steve Bromley" <bromley@xxxxxxx> 
  To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Branson Caching 


  - 
  The attachment may only download as 25K but when I looked at 
  the size of the message on the mail server (the real test), 
  I see this message. 

  -------------------------------------- 
  This Email and its attachments total to 2756k bytes in size 
  which could take a few minutes to download. 
  ----------------------------------- 

  2756k bytes is about 2.7 meg. I know that Outlook does a 
  lot of fancing wrapping of the messages, and the encoding 
  takes room but I'm not sure how much. Anyone with dialup 
  will feel the full pain of 2.7 meg. 

  Steve 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Sarah Chisholm <sarah_cf30@xxxxxxxxx> 
  To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Branson Caching 
  Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:31:02 -0700 (PDT) 

  >It was only 25kb in my e-mail box, Roger. How did you end 
  >up with 3mb? 
  > 
  >Sarah 
  > 
  >----- Original Message ---- 
  >From: "rogbarn@xxxxxxxxxxx" <rogbarn@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
  >To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  >Cc: HoosierDaddy <_rnx_@xxxxxxx> 
  >Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 9:55:33 AM 
  >Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Branson Caching 
  > 
  >- 
  >sending 3 MB to a list is wrong. the list allowing 
  >attachments is wrong. Next time, please indicate what you 
  >have and offer to email it privately. Some people can't 
  >handle such large email easily. 
  > 
  >Thanks. 
  >Roger 
  > 
  >---- HoosierDaddy <_rnx_@xxxxxxx> wrote: 
  > 
  > 
  > **************************************** 
  > For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including 
  >unsubscribing from this 
  > list, click -----> 
  >//www.freelists.org/list/geocaching 
  > Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived 
  >http://tinyurl.com/87cqw 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 

  Steve 


  **************************************** 
  For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this 
  list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching 
  Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw 



    

  **************************************** For List Info or To make _ANY_ 
changes, including unsubscribing from this list, click -----> 
//www.freelists.org/list/geocaching Missouri Caches Scheduled to be 
Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw 

  **************************************** For List Info or To make _ANY_ 
changes, including unsubscribing from this list, click -----> 
//www.freelists.org/list/geocaching Missouri Caches Scheduled to be 
Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw 

Other related posts: