-
we all make choices that have consequences. just keep in mind all the privlidges that living in Washington provides to keep your minds off the other troubles. i bet you can leave you front door unlocked without the fear of a crackhead walking through it and stealing your melba toast. No DSL is a small price to pay for that kind of peace of mind.
------ Original Message ------
Received: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:14:15 PM EDT
From: "Tim and Pam" <timpam2mocachers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Branson Caching
It’s not our fault we are stuck in the dark ages. We have talked and talked to AT&T about getting DSL out in Washington/Krakow area and they just don’t think it’s important. Yes we can get satellite but we refuse to pay $60.00 @ month. So if any works for AT&T and they can help get the phone system updated out here please do so! Heck our phone went out last week Thursday and since we live in
Tim
www.tueltzen.smugmug.com
From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of HoosierDaddy
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 4:23 PM
To:
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Branson Caching
My sincerest appology to all those internet users who are still in the dark ages. I live and work in a world where we push terabits/sec of data around the globe. I frequently forget that there are users out there trying to read e-mail on their Apple 2+ and/or IBM PCjr over a 13.3K modem. I will make your problem my problem.
"will the highways of the internet become more few?" - W
------ Original Message ------
Received: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:59:52 PM EDT
From: "Steve Bromley" <
To:
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Branson Caching
-
The attachment may only download as 25K but when I looked at
the size of the message on the mail server (the real test),
I see this message.
--------------------------------------
This Email and its attachments total to 2756k bytes in size
which could take a few minutes to download.
-----------------------------------
2756k bytes is about 2.7 meg. I know that Outlook does a
lot of fancing wrapping of the messages, and the encoding
takes room but I'm not sure how much. Anyone with dialup
will feel the full pain of 2.7 meg.
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: Sarah Chisholm <sarah_cf30@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Branson Caching
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
>It was only 25kb in my e-mail box, Roger. How did you end
>up with 3mb?
>
>Sarah
>
>----- Original Message ----
>From: "rogbarn@xxxxxxxxxxx" <rogbarn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To:
>Cc: HoosierDaddy <_rnx_@xxxxxxx>
>Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 9:55:33 AM
>Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Branson Caching
>
>-
>sending 3 MB to a list is wrong. the list allowing
>attachments is wrong. Next time, please indicate what you
>have and offer to email it privately. Some people can't
>handle such large email easily.
>
>Thanks.
>Roger
>
>---- HoosierDaddy <_rnx_@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> ****************************************
> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including
>unsubscribing from this
> list, click ----->
>//www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived
>http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>
>
>
>
>
Steve
****************************************
For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
