[GeoStL] Re: Bogus MOGA logs-I have to admit, you had a good point

  • From: Christian Jundt <cjundt797@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:26:28 -0500

I had to take an extra Zoloft after reading all of these yesterday. 

Have a Coke and a smile. 


On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:11, Bob TheCacher <cachefinder@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It's getting pretty rough in here.  
> Bob
> 
> From: velynetarlos@xxxxxxxxx
> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Bogus MOGA logs-I have to admit, you had a good point
> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:44:32 -0500
> 
> Get off the damn computer and go out to Greene County.  There are plenty of 
> dead horses for you to beat on out there.  We are overly tired to seeing you 
> piss and moan about you not being considered god.  No one cares any more.  
> You loose more credibility with each rant.  Are you so dense that you do not 
> reqlize that you are the butt of every joke in Missouri and Illinous 
> caching????
> 
>  
> 
> From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Bensman
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 9:36 PM
> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Bogus MOGA logs-I have to admit, you had a good point
> 
>  
> 
> LOL! But I bet you would have no trouble getting to 100K “finds” if there 
> were not any caches.  I’m sure you could come up with some rationale to claim 
> more and more finds!
> 
>  
> 
> SLAGA’s real champion cacher emailed me today – I bet you will never guess 
> why he told me he quit caching. 
> 
>  
> 
> I can understand why number hounds want real cachers to quit. 
> 
>  
> 
> Jim Bensman
> "Nature Bats Last"
> 
> From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bernie Ver Hey
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 9:00 PM
> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Bogus MOGA logs-I have to admit, you had a good point
> 
>  
> 
> Michael, then there wouldn’t be any caches to find.  Bernie
> 
>  
> 
> From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Rogers
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 7:07 PM
> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Bogus MOGA logs-I have to admit, you had a good point
> 
>  
> 
> I got it! Maybe Groundspeak can make an attribute like "Myotis-approved cache"
> 
>  
> 
> From: Libby Morehead <gmalibby@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Mon, April 4, 2011 5:53:29 PM
> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Bogus MOGA logs-I have to admit, you had a good point
> 
> -
> Yes I have done that more than once. They act like it must be their lucky 
> day. 
> Gma
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Mike Lusicic <lusicic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > -
> > It could also give you an opportunity to introduce the couple on the bench 
> > to geocaching!
> > 
> > On 4/4/2011 10:53 AM, David Diederich wrote:
> >> Everyone is different.  I understand why you might want to log the cache 
> >> in San Juan. You went through the effort of finding the cache, probably 
> >> traveled a great distance and due to circumstances beyound your control, 
> >> you were unable to retrieve the cache.
> >> But for me and my own personal rules, I have to find the cache.  If 
> >> someone or something prevents me from finding the cache, then I didn't 
> >> find it.  I don't see any point to log a cache that I didn't find.
> >> A cache on park bench probably requires searching when muggles aren't 
> >> present or can be maybe when they are distracted.  Taking a shortcut to 
> >> claim the cache, because of pedestrian traffic or timing is against my 
> >> rules.
> >> Island Dave
> >> 
> >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Bob TheCacher <cachefinder@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> >> <mailto:cachefinder@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >> 
> >>      I guess I'm one of the "bad" cachers out there.  A couple of
> >>    weeks ago while in San Juan I went to a cache on a park bench only
> >>    to find 2 people enjoying their lunch while sitting on top of the
> >>    cache.  I hung around there hoping they would leave, but they
> >>    looked planted on the bench.  I took my picture in the area and
> >>    logged it as a "find". I figured it was better than compromising
> >>    the cache location by reaching between their legs ( and maybe
> >>    getting punched or shot ).  You can throw rotten tomatoes at me
> >>    the next time you see me.
> >>    Bob Pratt
> >>    BBD1

Other related posts: