-
And how would you know that there have been "multiple reports that
this cache was " (a) Illegal, (b) DESTROYED, (c) ABANDONED, and on
top of it, (d) the cache was in DIRECT violation of numerous park
rules, and (e) the caches in question were
causing direct and proximal damage to the environment they inhabited."
I dont remember getting any such emails. Perhaps you were dealing
with another admin?
Glenn
At 09:27 PM 5/8/2005, J.A. Terranson wrote:
-
On Sun, 8 May 2005, Tim & Pam Ueltzen wrote:
> I guess there isn't much point in hiding any more caches if someone is going
> to remove them because they think it should not be there.
I would agree. However, this is not the case. Remember, there have been MULTIPLE reports to the admin that this cache was (a) Illegal, (b) DESTROYED, (c) ABANDONED, and on top of it, (d) the cache was in DIRECT violation of numerous park rules, and (e) the caches in question were causing direct and proximal damage to the environment they inhabited.
At no point did I "just decide I didn't like it" and remove it.
-- Yours,
J.A. Terranson sysadmin@xxxxxxx 0xBD4A95BF
"What this country needs is a good old fashioned nuclear enema."
---------------- Glenn, Missouri Geocachers Assoc http://www.MoGeo.com *THE* Forums for Mo & Ks. http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php?
Dave's Handy Hiding Hints http://www.ratisher.com/geocache_hiding.htm MOGA 2005 Winners ... Check it out! http://moga.geostl.com
