I wouldn't want to be led into the situation that geo-jim encountered. If it is private property and the cache placer (http://tinyurl.com/aj3hp) didn't get permission to hide a cache there, then I think he should archive it. It is true that some cemetaries are on private property. Unfortunately, they don't all have signs next to them stating such. Caches in cemetaries owned and maintained by churches would most likely not have this type of problem (note I didn't say 'never'). It is up to the cache placer to do the research and get permission. I hate to butcher an old saying, but 'ignorance of geocaching policy is no excuse'. > From: "Susan Ring" <susanmring@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 21:35:24 -0500 > I guess my point is that it is a cache owner's > responsibility to avoid exposing cachers > to any unnecessary or excessive danger.