Dear ALl, Plaese make OSS's Banking Software 'SANGAMITHRA'source code open and obey the rules of GPL. --- PostgreSQL Server <eiidp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday 21 Jan 2003 9:50 pm, you wrote: > > > I started this thread with the statement that > primary issue is not > > whether OSS is giving code or not.OSS is not doing > anything against > > the rules of GNU GPL. But remember its more than a > license. The stand > > of OSS is misinforming the people. They never talk > of the ethical > > reason behind Free Software. For OSS its just a > cost effective solution > > and Free Software provides a better business > avenue. > > > > OSS did not misinform any body. Our stand is well > informed. We act for ethical > reason behind GPL. I did not get what Arun exactly > meant by 'better business > avenue', If he meant for its conventional meaning, > In our social situation > proprietary is more profitable, which is not the > business avenue of OSS. > > I think Arun will take time to realise about OSS, > for which he has to get rid > of his narrow minded approach in accepting others > activity. > > > Feeling i get from OSS's stand is. They want to > leverage the > > popularity and financial benefits of Free > Software. At the same time > > not interested in sharing the code in the spirit > of Free > > Software. Here Freedom is restricted not through > license but through > > practice. It will be right to say OSS is misusing > GNU GPL. > > May be Arun's version of GPL. I am still sure that > he could not get what OSS > policy and practice is. > > > > > Even when i put forward my strong objections to > OSS, I admire the > > enthusiasm and commitment of OSS team. But they > misinform people and > > that is our concern. I still hope OSS will change > its stand in the > > spirit of the community. > > Commitment and opprtunism will not co-exists, so one > of his stand regarding > OSS should be wrong. > > As I have mention OSS policy and practice through my > mail in this thread, I > think most of you, whoever has followed it with a > clear thought, might have > realised it. You may or may not agree with it. > > With this I stop discussion regarding OSS in this > thread. > > > > > BTW, I think EIID was a socially funded project(by > the District > > Panchayath). As i said code is yet to see light of > Freedom. > > Anybody can get it from Kunnanthunadu Panchayath or > Chottanikkara Panchayath > vikasana samithy without any payment. (Since EIID > office is now permenantly > closed you maynot get it from EIID office) > > One more think I would like to mention here is that > eventhough EIID was a > socially funded project, Software developmentof > Local Resource Database > preparation was not fully funded by District > Panchayath. As per its project > proposal renmaining fund shold have been come from > state goverment. This has > been obstructed by IKM. So, in fact last few months > of this project we have > been working on voluntary basis. > > Now let us have fresh discussion regarding IT policy > > Regards, > > Anil, ATPS > > > --------------------------------------------- > FSUG-Kozhikode Home Page : > //www.freelists.org/webpage/fsug-calicut > --------------------------------------------- > > > > > ===== P T A Ashraf Akkode email:ashraf@xxxxxxxxx ashraf_akkod@xxxxxxxxx __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------- FSUG-Kozhikode Home Page : //www.freelists.org/webpage/fsug-calicut ---------------------------------------------