[fruityloops] Re: difference b/w f.l. and mpc

  • From: Andrew Ebling <andyebling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: fruityloops@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: 22 Aug 2002 07:57:57 +0000

On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 06:44, Gwydion Elderwyn wrote:
> > Sheer throughput capability is not most important issue here; latency
> > is.  You can probably get a good few channels of audio USB, but I think
> > the latency tends to suffer on most interfaces.
> For recording, yes - but not for playback.  I've run 16 channels out of my
> UA100 with no problems at all.  And because it has ASIO drivers, the
> softsynth latency was always <10ms!

wow <10ms for a USB interface?  Thats cool.  Better than an SBLive and I
bet you aren't stuck at 48khz sampling rate ;-)

I think some of the m-audio interfaces have internal routing you can
switch in to allow realtime monitoring for recording.


The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may
be legally privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not
a named addressee, please inform us as soon as possible on
+44 118 901 2999 and then delete the e-mail from your system. If you are
not a named addressee you must not copy, use, disclose, distribute,
print or rely on this e-mail. Any views expressed in this e-mail or any
attachments may not necessarily reflect those of Tao's management.
Although we routinely screen for viruses, addressees should scan this
e-mail and any attachments for viruses. Tao makes no representation or
warranty as to the absence of viruses in this e-mail or any attachments.
Please note that for the protection of our business, we may monitor and
read e-mails sent to and from our server(s).

Visit our website at http://tao-group.com/

Other related posts: