Rosalind While you are correct that such matters are (should) be stipulated in the donor agreement (contract), it is completely reasonable to retain the origional name and add something like "Refurbished by Joe Blow, 2015" *Steve* Steve M. Solomon, MSW Consultant, Organisational & Resource Development *יועץ מומחה , פיתוח ארגוני ומשאבים * (972) 54 309 6444 in Israel (1 732) 410 4958 in the USA and Canada Sאקהק [image: --] Sאקהק Sאקהק On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:06 AM, rosalind elbaum <rosalindelbaum@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We have several named buildings that are now twenty – thirty years old. We > need to carry out extensive renovations. Is there a standard practice that > after a certain period names on buildings can be changed? This would enable > us to offer naming a building to cover the cost of the renovations. > > Understandably it would be best if a time period was clearly stated in any > contract drawn up with a donor. But presuming the donation and subsequent > dedication was made without a contract, is there any accepted code of > conduct for renaming buildings? > > > > Chag sameach, > > > Rosalind > > > > > >