Samuel Penn wrote: > I'm up for putting my name to something, but we're not the only group > making a noise about this. Debian has as well, and they're a much > louder user base. It may be an idea to see if they've spoken to the > FSF about this. I assume that they have, and that the FSF is very much > aware that quite a few people don't like the Invariant clause. The Debian Group have made several attempts to sway the FSF against using Invariant Sections in the up-coming 1.2 version of the FDL. However, the FSF have been far from receptive to the suggested alterations. Please see my last email for links to discussions about the FDL. Please note, due to a recent crack the Debian lists server is down, but cached versions of the discussion can be found in Google. I agree that a lot of pressure has already been brought to bear, but every little helps. I don't think anything will come of writing a letter to the FSF, but it is always worth a try. Anyway, here is the letter in our Wiki: http://www.freeroleplay.org/wiki/index.php/Letter%20to%20FSF Please feel free to modify and add your names to list at the bottom of the page. -- Ricardo Gladwell President, Free Roleplaying Community http://www.freeroleplay.org/ president@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx