[freedict] Re: revisionDesc/change
- From: Piotr Bański <bansp@xxxxx>
- To: freedict@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:05:50 +0100
On 07/12/17 13:50, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
Hi Piotr
Piotr Bański schrieb am 07.12.2017, 12:43 +0100:
The howto is outdated, as far as I recall. It never got modified since P4,
No, I rewrote major parts of it. But I updated it with information on what I saw
in the dictionaries, which isn't necessarily the TEI reality.
Ahhh, I apologize! I didn't mean to demean that, gosh, I forgot that you
did more than just reedit.
I didn't say anything about <name>, and frankly, I don't even fully understand
your question
Karl asked whether we are using name or the who attribute or both to markup
authors.
I don't think he's posed this very alternative or I misunderstood (by
maybe wrongly rationalizing Karl's question). You use both, of course.
<name> in the respStmt, and @who to refer back to the <name>.
You mentioned that swh-eng is a good example That one doesn't use name.
From my experience so far, the who attribute of the change tag only contains
user names,
Nope, @who contains a reference.
swh-eng contains, for example:
<respStmt>
<resp>corrected by</resp>
<name xml:id="bansp">Piotr Bański, bansp at o2.pl</name>
</respStmt>
and then, lower down, e.g.
<change n="0.4.2" when="2009-04-17" who="#bansp">
the name tag contains the real name. Personally, I don't care about
the user name, rather about the real name.
There is no "user name". You are confusing "user name" with a reference
(more precisely, a reference to a <name> element).
<name xml:id="shumenda">Sebastian Humenda</name>
contains your name and an ID that may accidentally be identical to what
you chose as a user name on some systems. But in this case, the concept
of a user name doesn't exist.
Therefore is my question, basically
the similar to Karl's question: which one to use, or even both? Should one of
these approaches be enforced by the ODD?
If you consider something outdated, please tell me/us, I'm writing tooling to
automate processes and I don't want to automate the wrong thing.
Sorry for any confusion caused.
No problem, I hope I've managed to shed some light on that.
Best,
P.
--
FreeDict â Free And Open Dictionaries
Manage your subscription at
//www.freelists.org/list/freedict
Wiki:
https://github.com/freedict/fd-dictionaries/wiki
Web:
http://freedict.org
Other related posts:
