[freedict] Re: discussion: make install and other FD improvements
- From: Einhard Leichtfuß <alguien@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: freedict@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 00:05:05 +0200
On 2018-05-14 11:03, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
The files I found, though the API appears unchanged to me. That helps meSorry, I simply didn't upload the new files, online now (would have been with
already though, so thanks!
the next dictionary release anyway). It's also documented in the Wiki.
Thanks, that simplifies the process.
Concerning presentation, I'd suggest a link `[SHA512]' after eachOk, so you wouldn't present the hash directory on the website?
download link on the downloads page, pointing to the corresponding
Those checksums are long. Does not really look nice in my opionion to
put them right after the file links. Also, the people who are going to
compare the checksums will have to run sha512sum (or equivalent)
anyways, so providing the possibility to just use `sha512sum -c
file.sha512' does not sound so bad.
I wonder whether
it would confuse people if they would download a .sha512 file. But I'm not
checksums regularly and don't know what's best practise. If nobody has any
objections, I'll implement it that way in the next days.
Maybe a short description how to use the .sha512 files should be added.
Another option would be to put all the checksums in one big file, e.g.
named SHA512 and link to that. However this is rather problematic due
to all the files being updated independantly and residing in different
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Other related posts: