[freedict] Re: Changes without changed version
- From: Sebastian Humenda <shumenda@xxxxxx>
- To: freedict@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 22:49:10 +0200
Hi
Einhard Leichtfuß schrieb am 08.09.2018, 17:42 +0200:
Another concern is how to nicely add a changelog entry to a dictionary's
source
stating that the source hasn't changed, but that there is a new version
nevertheless. I don't know what is common sense here.
Well, what was changed then, if not the source? The .src.tar.xz files
at least changed. I thought the generation process was defined by the
freedict-tools.
Exactly. The FreeDict tools now generate IPA phonemes for headwords which don't
have it already, using espeak-ng. Therefore the source didn't change, the binary
dictionaries did. The re-deployment triggered a regeneration of the source
archives and I suppose the hash is different, because the tar archive contains a
timestamp.
If I ever would need to do something similar in the future, I would probably
add a deploy rule which can skip the source archive generation.
The current releases have been overwritten, do you still require a new minor
version?
Well, no. I will just increment minor versions myself (Arch packages
add their own minor version, e.g. 1.2.3-4).
Great, if that works with the Arch policy.
Cheers
Sebastian
--
Web:
https://www.crustulus.de ;(English|Deutsch) | Blog:
https://www.crustulus.de/blog
FreeDict: Free multilingual dictionaries -
http://www.freedict.org
Freies Latein-Deutsch-Wörterbuch:
https://www.crustulus.de/freedict.de.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Other related posts:
