thank you, I'll look at both approaches and see which one I like more.
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 22:42, Sebastian Humenda <shumenda@xxxxxx> wrote:
Gorzy Gorup schrieb am 15.08.2020, 23:20 +0200:
I get it now! So these are then standalone entries with proper grammatical
information in <gramGrp></ gramGrp>... (I hope that's right?)
Just to add another possibility:
@Piotr, what would be the equivalent to `form type="infl"` for the
Would it then be appropriate (or at least nice) to link these derivatives
to their original words via cross referencing?
Sure, if you would like to do it that way, just look up `xr`. However, I
the monolithic version better :).