Re: [foxboro] Solaris: rexec on second-Ethernet

  • From: "Mostafa mohamed" <mostafa_atatork@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:31:19 +0000

I thought it is the same as  /usr/bin/rexec because it is doing the same 
function of rexec()



Mostafa





>From: "Johnson, Alex P (IPS)" <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [foxboro] Solaris: rexec on second-Ethernet
>Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 07:54:49 -0400
>
>/usr/local/rexec is a Foxboro written utility. =
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Alex Johnson
>Invensys Systems, Inc.
>10900 Equity Drive
>Houston, TX 77041
>713.329.8472 (voice)
>713.329.1700 (fax)
>713.329.1600 (switchboard)
>alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
>On=
>  Behalf Of Mostafa mohamed
>Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 12:41 AM
>To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [foxboro] Solaris: rexec on second-Ethernet
>
>HI
>rexec is a unix utility. it opens a port and a socket to the hostname you =
>
>write.
>what I beleive is that it is not possible through the second ethernet card 
>=
>
>as you can see from cshell that it sees the first NIC so can you try 
>rlogin=
>  =
>
>on the same machine with the second ethernet name and try rexec.
>I think rsh will not do the same as rexec will redirect the output to your 
>=
>
>screen other wise you have to redirect the output to a file then copy the =
>
>file to the originated workstation
>
>
>
>Mostafa
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: Corey R Clingo <corey.clingo@xxxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Re: [foxboro] Solaris: rexec on second-Ethernet
> >Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:15:23 -0500
> >
> >I tried "rexec otheraw 'ls /' " here.  According to snoop, it doesn't 
>even=
>
> >send out any IP traffic (nor does it give any output from the ls).  I
> >would therefore have to second Alex's recommendation to use rsh instead,
> >or other roll-yer-own alternatives like ssh.  rexec lives in /usr/local,
> >so I guess it is some sort of Foxboro utility and not the standard one
> >from Unix.ls /sbin/r*
> >
> >IP traffic will flow over the second ethernet if you use an IP address on
> >the second ethernet as a target.  We define an additional set of
> >hostnames, like 01aw23a, 02aw13a for AWs 01AW23 and 02AW13, respectively.
> >These hostnames map to IP addresses on a different network from the
> >nodebus, e.g., 172.16.1.23, 172.16.1.13, either in every machine's
> >/etc/hosts or in DNS.
> >
> >
> >We can then do "rsh 01aw23a" from 02AW13 and it will go over the second
> >ethernet rather than the nodebus.
> >
> >
> >Corey Clingo
> >BASF Corporation
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >"Hegewisch, Dirk" <Dirk.Hegewisch@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >07/30/2007 07:13 AM
> >Please respond to
> >foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >To
> ><foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >cc
> >
> >Subject
> >[foxboro] Solaris: rexec on second-Ethernet
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Hi list.
> >
> >In some scripts we are using rexec on our AWs.
> >
> >Unfortunately does the Foxboro rexec only use the Nodebus (first Ethernet
> >connection)
> >
> >Another Problem is that the Foxboro rexec requires an X-Client (Port 
>6000)=
>
> >to work with "normal" Speed ...
> >A simple "rexec AWLBUG /bin/ls" took nearly one Minute (If you don't
> >believe - try it)
> >
> >Now we are looking for a solution to use rexec on the second-Ethernet.
> >
> >VSM21U# which rexec
> >/usr/local/rexec
> >VSM21U# what /usr/local/rexec
> >/usr/local/rexec:
> >dsserver.c      7.2 Foxboro Company 8/15/90
> >sf_server.c     1.1 50 Series I/A, Foxboro Company 9/24/91
> >dsamap.c        2.1 vc
> >iserve.c        7.2 I/A , Foxboro Co. 8/15/90
> >....
> >
> >How can we use the original Solaris rexec?  Any Ideas?
> >
> >Regards
> >Dirk Hegewisch
> >__________________________________________________________
> >INEOS K=F6ln GmbH
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> >Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> >your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
> >
> >foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> >to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
> >to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> >Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> >your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
> >
> >foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> >to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
> >to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>http://newlivehotmail.com
>
>  =
>
>  =
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
>Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
>your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>  =
>
>foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
>to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
>to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
>  =
>
>
>
>
>Confidentiality Notice:
>The information contained in this electronic message and any attachment(s) 
>=
>to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) and 
>=
>may contain confidential, privileged or proprietary information. If you 
>are=
>  not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, delete 
>a=
>ll copies of this message and any attachment(s). Any other use of the 
>E-Mai=
>l by you is prohibited.
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
>Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
>your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
>foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
>to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
>to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>

_________________________________________________________________
http://liveearth.msn.com

 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: