Robin, What do you get when you do snoop from one of the AWs or WPs? Any traffic? If you just want to count packets do "snoop -d hme0 -o /dev/null" on a D/E or "snoop -d le0 -o /dev/null" for a B box. What do netstat -i and ifconfig -a show from AW and/or WPs? Does a workstation come back from a reboot still smurfed? Are the workstations smurfed for data from all control stations or just from particular ones? You should be able to use a DNBT to connect a laptop to the nodebus, use CA or CB as a letterbug (CA - listen on both, send on A). For snooping the network, you can use any of a wide variety of sniff.exe or snoop.exe tools, however it's very likely that these will be considered spyware by most corporate security systems (for good reason - spyware often uses these tools for various nefarious purposes). My personal preference is to use one of the Linux Live CDs with a set of network tools (especially Ethereal) in a laptop for doing network analysis and a memory stick or flash card for collecting the data and reports. Foxboro have a good solution - a laptop with a version of NAI's Sniffer Pro with drivers and tools specifically for sniffing the Nodebus - TAC or Fox Service should have more details. Regards, Kevin FitzGerrell Quoting "Burnham, Robin" <robin.burnham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Isolated nodebus with CP's and Gateways, 8 workstations. IA 4.3 > > Apparent nodebus problem, One workstation starts smurfing and after a > few > days all workstations are smurfed. Everything is still green and CP's > still > going, just no interface to workstations. > There are OM overruns and Mac Sublayer counts, CP OM overruns range > from > 23 to 264 for a 48 hour period. > grep jabber on /var/adm came back with nothing. > > Thinking of snoop on Nodebus but due to a Comm10 connection that is > only > as good as the nodebus connection which is unreliable. > > Has anyone run a snoop from a laptop? If so, can you tell me how to > connect? > > Anyone got anything? > > Any response is appreciated. > > Burnbomb > > -----Original Message----- > From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Johnson, Alex P (IPS) > Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 3:22 PM > To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [foxboro] Display Manager fonts for FoxView > > Re: Also, a new 'feature' in our case seems to be an 'extra' window > (minimized small in the upper left area of the desktop). It is non > functional and there's nothing in it but you can't close it or > otherwise > get rid of it > This issue came up as a CAR against FoxCTS somewhere or another. After > some investigation, we received a copy of the following e-mail. > > --------- > It seems that the little window in the top left hand corner of Foxview > 9.02 is seen on more sites. > > The problem is this: > If Foxview uses an environment that has the display bar at the left > hand > side disabled by putting the command "dmcmd display_bar off" in the > *.env file AND also the reference to the display bar file > "$ENV_DIR/Operator.dbr" is removed then the little window in the top > left hand corner will appear. > > The workaround is to put the reference to the display bar file back in > the *.env file: "$ENV_DIR/Operator.dbr". > > Even if this *.dbr file does not exist, the reference alone should be > enough to make the little window disappear. > > The problem is also documented in car 1008496. > > Can you confirm that you are also seeing this problem? > > ------ > > As you can see, it seems to be a specific combination of things. Try > the > fix. > > > AJ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Johnson, Theodore (Ted) > S > Sent: Wed 9/27/2006 12:35 PM > To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [foxboro] Display Manager fonts for FoxView > =20 > Just an update for those who might be interested... > > We did not try to reconvert (second time) using the 9.0.2 utility > because we felt at that time we had already 'invested' too much time > into the graphics migration effort after the first conversion to start > over. > > The FoxView 9.0.2 did solve some of our concerns (fast blink rate on > colors is actually fast now, we use this to indicate at a glance which > loops are in alarm; and rapid input via use of ramping arrow buttons > works much better), however we still have issues with window sizing, > fonts/readability, etc. Some of it seems to be product issues and some > seem to be configuration related. Also, a new 'feature' in our case > seems to be an 'extra' window (minimized small in the upper left area > of > the desktop). It is non functional and there's nothing in it but you > can't close it or otherwise get rid of it.=3D20 > > Foxboro personnel have left the site. I am told and being reassured by > the folks in Foxboro Houston and our local service rep that they are > working on all our issues with TAC and are doing some more testing > before they return. We are trying to work through the 'proper channels' > but are still waiting for final resolution.=3D20 > > Meanwhile, we have reverted back (temporarily?) to using Display > Manager. The workstations have been changed back to boot up into > Display Manager instead of Foxview and the alarm annunciator keyboards > have been reconfigured to call up the DM graphics (instead of > FoxView).=3D20 > > > =3D20 > > -----Original Message----- > From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of tom.vandewater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 6:40 AM > To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [foxboro] Display Manager fonts for FoxView > > Ted, > Thanks for that information. Please let the list know if/when > the new DM > FV conversion tool meets your expectation in regard to the > font conversion issue. > Cheers, > Tom VandeWater > > -----Original Message----- > From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Johnson, Theodore (Ted) S > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 1:42 PM > To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [foxboro] Display Manager fonts for FoxView > > Over the last two years we have gone from 51B->F, v4.3->v7.1/8.1, > cp30/40->CP60/270, legacy Historian->Aim*, Nodebus/CLAN->Mesh/ATS) and > are now working on DM->FoxView. We have also experienced issues with > fonts and other items not working/looking/acting the same after the > conversion. Foxboro has had various folks (on & off site) working on > our converted graphics so that they function as our operators > rightfully > expect them to. Fortunately DM and FoxView peacefully co-exist. > Anyway, there are still a couple of things that we're hoping (led to > believe) will be fixed in FoxView v9.0.2. We have just received a copy > and a Foxboro engineer and field service rep are on-site > testing/loading > the new version. > > The FoxView v9.0.2 Release Notes (P/N B0193WL Rev L, dated July 18 > 2006) Section 6.1.2 (entitled 'DM Font Conversion') states on page 33: > > "Previously, when DM displays were converted to FoxView > displays using conversion tools, the text indicated in displays were > sometimes of incorrect size and misaligned. FoxView 9.0.2 includes the > functionality to handle DM conversion correctly for Solaris platforms." > =3D3D3D20 > Also FYI the release notes Appendix B (entitled 'Problems Resolved in > V9.0.1') details 70 items (mainly CARs) in FoxView (40), FoxSelect (1), > FoxDraw (18), DEdit, (5), and Enhanced Detail Displays (6) that have > been addressed. > > The User Notes are not yet posted on the Invensys GPS (ex-CSC) website > (controlled release?), so check with your friendly neighborhood Foxboro > service organization and/or call TAC. > > =3D3D3D20 > > -----Original Message----- > From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of stan > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 12:40 AM > To: Foxboro List > Subject: [foxboro] Display Manager fonts for FoxView > > Does anyone know if anything ever came of the project to create a set > of > fonts for FoxView that matches the Display Manager fonts? > > We are converting one node, and th operators are complaining that the > resultant converted graphics are hard to read. > > -- > Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the > simplicity. > (Dennis Ritchie) > =3D3D3D20 > =3D3D3D20 > ________________________________________ > _______________________________ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at > your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > =3D3D3D20 > foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: =3D3D3D > mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3D3D3Djoin > to unsubscribe: =3D3D3D > mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3D3D3Dleave > =3D 3D3D20 > =3D3D20 > =3D3D20 > ______________________________________________ > _________________________ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at > your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > =3D3D20 > foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: =3D3D > mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3D3Djoin > to unsubscribe: =3D3D > mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3D3Dleave > =3D3D20 > =3D20 > =3D20 > ________________________________________________________ > _______________ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at > your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > =3D20 > foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: =3D > mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3Djoin > to unsubscribe: =3D > mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3Dleave > =3D20 > =20 > =20 > __________________________________________________________________ > _____ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at > your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > =20 > foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: = > mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin > to unsubscribe: = > mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave > =20 > > > -- No attachments (even text) are allowed -- > -- Type: application/ms-tnef > -- File: winmail.dat > > > =20 > =20 > _____________________________________________ > __________________________ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at > your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > =20 > foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: = > mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin > to unsubscribe: = > mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave > =20 > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > _ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at > your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > > foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join > to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave > > _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave