Re: [foxboro] Logic block question
- From: Gregory A Hurwitt <gregory.hurwitt@xxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:52:31 -0500
In fact, the documentation states explicitly: "Real inputs are supported
only for timing logic operations."
(B0193AX, Rev. S, Section 75.1, footnote 1 at the bottom of the table)
You might want to consider a MATH block if you're looking to minimize block
memory.
Greg Hurwitt
BASF Freeport
foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 10/12/2007 10:43:25 AM:
> There are certain commands which can still be used with the real inputs,
for
> example DON, DOFF, OSP.
> Maks
>
>
>
> On 10/12/07, dirk.pauwels@xxxxxxxxxx <dirk.pauwels@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know why the logic block has 2 Real in's when a command
like
> > IN
> > RI01 does not work? I keep getting configuration error on this step and
> > now
> > I'm forced to use a CALC block just for a couple of lines of code.... I
> > can't find anything in the manual regarding this strange behaviour
> > We're using I/A 6.3
> >
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
