Well, I tried this :C.B.INHALM.FFFF and I wasn't able to inhibit the alarms. Seems backwards, try it and let me know. Thanks, David At 03:31 PM 9/1/2006, you wrote: >David, > >Thank you, as this format is acceptable to the Control Configurator, but it >does not secure the parameter like the INHIB example. I can still prohibit >the individual block alarms from the select display. Why? > >Is my solution even a valid one? > > >Joseph M. Riccardi, Inc. >DCS Services - Industrial Process Control > >North-Central Office (OH, PA, MI, IN, WV Area) >South-East Office (FL, GA, AL, SC, NC Area) > >Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >"To give real service you must add something that cannot be bought or >measured with money; and that is sincerity and integrity." - Donald A. Adams > > >-----Original Message----- >From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >Behalf Of David Johnson >Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 4:12 PM >To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: [foxboro] Inhibit alarms; NOT > >Someone probably already answered this >But >C:B.INHALM.0000 >It is expecting a 4 digit hex mask > >I tried it and it seems to work. > >Regards >David > >PS does it show that I am looking for more interesting work than drawing >displays? > > >-----Original Message----- >From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >Behalf Of Joseph M. Riccardi >Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 4:01 PM >To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [foxboro] Inhibit alarms; NOT > >Folks, > >This plant needs to prevent the inhibiting of certain (critical) alarms from >the Select Display by operators; period. No way, no one (from an >operational display), never, ... > >I thought it would be easy just to secure the INHIB parameter with >C:B.INHIB.0. That worked at the block level, but the operators soon >discovered that they could select the individual block alarms >(Select/Alarms/HIABS, HHABS, etc.) and Toggle them to INHIBITED. > >So to prevent this, I thought I could just secure the INHALM parameter in >the same way as the INHIB parameter. Since the INHALM parameter is a packed >boolean (range 0-FFFFFFFF), I thought C:B.INHALM.0 would to the trick, but >the Control Configurator will not accept it. > >What format/syntax is the INHALM parameter expecting? 0 should be a valid >value; no? > >Or any other suggestions? > >Thanks in advance for your help ... > >PS. Yes, we are on a path to evaluate all alarms, but I need your help in >the short term ... > >Joseph M. Riccardi, Inc. >DCS Services - Industrial Process Control > >North-Central Office (OH, PA, MI, IN, WV Area) South-East Office (FL, GA, >AL, SC, NC Area) Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >"To give real service you must add something that cannot be bought or >measured with money; and that is sincerity and integrity." - Donald A. Adams > > > >_______________________________________________________________________ >This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process >Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at >your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > >foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro >to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join >to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave > _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave