Hi David, i appreciate the news (!!!) one thing bothers me though: rumor has it that Microsoft is dropping support for the Windows NT 4 is there any mentioned anticipation as to move on to Windows 2000? (some competitors have it already) for greenhorn like me, this is not so bad as i haven't got along well with Unix yet Regards, JM Saputra ----- Original Message ----- From: <drjohn@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 3:43 AM Subject: [foxboro] Fear & Loathing in Las Vega$ > > Greetings from sin city, > > DAM! (Hoover) nearby! Very impressive. > > Well here's the skinny after two action packed days of meetings. > > 1) Las Vegas does not have bare breasted women in Lido headdresses wandering > through the casinos. > > 2) I am down $15.50, which sucks. > > 3) Unix is dead. > > Some of you might want to know a bit more about that last one, so here goes. > > Foxboro (Invensys Process Systems) has made it clear that the LONG term > direction is to incorporate the ArchestrA (sic) [ar-'k&s-tr&] platform to be > the basis for the engineering toolset. The objective is to roll all of the > Invensys family's engineering configuration tools into one new common tool that > will let you configure anything from TRICONEX to I/A and perhaps a few third > party vendors as well. ArchestrA (sic) is a windows only solution, but the ICC > driver is not going to go away (hooray for us). In a nutshell, the Unix based > configuration tools have a limited lifetime. They say that you will have > client-server access to the engineering database over Micro$oft .NET (sic) > technology to be able to use multiple workstations to configure the database. > I would like to discuss Mark Davidson's presentation, but it was all > proprietary information. FoxView/FoxDraw (sic) will get at least one more > functional upgrade (FoxView 8(sic) is coming), but they intend to roll > WonderWare (sic) and FoxView (sic) into a single visualization package using > ArchestrA (sic) as the driving force at a later date. NT is definately the > AP/AW/WP platform of choice for the future and the Unix enhancements are, it > appears to me, a stop gap measure until Archestra is in place. > > I have looked at the NEW ICC demo and I can say that, I don't hate it. Which > is pretty good coming from me. I think that Invensys IPS, aka Foxboro, has a > good idea. I am hopeful that they don't fumble the implementation, and we get > a better, more usable, control configuration tool that everyone is happy with. > > > No other signifcant news from the front. Winston Jenks wants to know what you > think about this, and what questions you might have. Reply to the listserver > quick, cause after tomorrow morning we will not have an opportunity to quiz the > Foxboro suits about this. > > Regards, > > David "What the hell is a YO bet?" Johnson > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________ > This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by The Foxboro Company. > Use the information obtained here at your own risk. For disclaimer, > see http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html#maillist > > list info: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join > unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave > ___________________________________________________________________ This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by The Foxboro Company. Use the information obtained here at your own risk. For disclaimer, see http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html#maillist list info: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave