Re: [foxboro] FBM204 failed to be recognized by system
- From: Dan Butler <dbutler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:23:13 -0700
There are no hardware Letterbugs for 200 series (at least not that I know of).
The only thing that matters are baseplate and slot (the last two digits of your
"letterbug" name). Baseplates start their numbering at "0" whereas slots begin
numbering at "1". The 0/1 issue has tripped me up a few times.
Can you talk to the device in System Manager? Download to it? Take it on and
off line? Etc.
If your AIN/AOUT are in a new compound did you make sure to turn that compound
on?
-Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Brazell, Troy L
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 7:05 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] FBM204 failed to be recognized by system
Question? Did you use the correct letterbug Question? IACC or ICC Question? Is
it attached to the correct CP Suggestions Make sure the letterbug is seated
really good.
Build a new letterbug and try that.
I have had problems with one of the numbers or letters being bad and sometimes
the letterbug does not get seated.
Troy Brazell
Sr. Process Control Analyst
ISA CCST
Corporate Automation/Chief Corporate Office DCP Midstream
Office Phone 405.605.3877
Mobile Phone 405.301.2994
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jason.LJZ
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 7:49 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] FBM204 failed to be recognized by system
I am sure we have set the
IOMOPT = 1
IOM_ID
SCI=3/SCO=3
etc. correctly.
Thanks for your precious time and reply.
于 2012-1-18 16:29, Dirk Pauwels 写道:
>
> Q1: If your FBM is online and on scan it should be ok I guess
> Q2: not that I know off, we have plenty of them and can't remember we
> had problems during install
> Q3: Did you enter the IOM_ID and point nr?
> IOMOPT = 1?
> Did you enter the SCI=3/SCO=3?
>
> Rgds,
> Dirk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jason.LJZ
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:28 AM
> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [foxboro] FBM204 failed to be recognized by system
>
> Dear all,
>
> I just ran into a problem: we need to add a FBM204 to our system, which is
> I/A 7.0 with 4 pairs CP60 and six AW51/WP51(Sun Blade 150) stations.
>
> Before we added the FBM204, the system has no other FBM204 installed. We
> added a ECB2 and configured it as HWTYPE=204, SWTYPE=2. AIN and AOUT were
> added and configured.
>
> The status of ECB2 was ONLINE and ON_SCAN.
>
> The problem is when we checked the AIN and AOUT block, the AIN block was
> indicated as BAD I/O even the transmitter outside worked normally. When we
> set output of AOUT as 50%, no milliampere can be measured.
>
> We also added a FBM241C to our system, and it works fine once it was added.
> The difference is there are FBM241C already used in system.
>
> My question is:
>
> 1. Does it matter that there are same type FBM already installed in system?
> So the newly added modules can be recognized by system?
>
> 2. Is there any thing special about adding FBM204 to system?
>
> 3. What can I do to probably solve the problem?
>
> Thanks in advance for your precious time for reading this and any help is
> appreciated.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys
> Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you
> obtain here at your own risks. Read
> http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys
> Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you
> obtain here at your own risks. Read
> http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks.
Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks.
Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
