Tom, coming back on the FONBE's I now remember that we had a issue with them. They are actually on the same nodebus where the DNBX had its home. The fault we found was basically a crossover of the nodebus between two enclosures sitting behind the FONBE's. This offcourse aggravated the issues we had with the DNBX. There was no real problem with the FONBE's, as we found out. Cheers, Frits. BHP-NZSteel. -----Original Message----- From: tom.vandewater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tom.vandewater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:13 To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [foxboro] DNBX Solution - foxboro site Brian, We don't have any DNBX's but have nodebus extenders, (NBE's), which are connected to the nodebus in a similar fashion to DNBX's. I discovered that other users were experieincing problems on their display/work stations using DNBX's that sounded similar to problems we were seeing on our display/work stations that were communicating to CP's across nodebus extenders. This list was the source of information about DNBX communication problems. As I said in my reply to Frits, grounding wasn't our issue with NBE's although that was one of the first things we suspected. Replacing Copper/Thicknet connected NBE's with Fiber connected FONBE's made no difference for us. We still had the communication issues. DNBX's are a single module in dual nodebus cell that connects a to single workstation in a remote location. NBE's and/or FONBE's are used to extend the A and B nodebus individually to another cell bus in a remote location and require four modules A&B local and A&B remote to accomplish their task. Symptoms that we experienced with NBE's were extremely slow graphic call ups, CYAN screens caused by workstations inability to communicate with data sources such as CP's, high frequency of hot remarries of FT modules, FT modules going offline/non FT, and points that were marked as DELETED in AW som object manager lists that were really good points running in a CP. Our problems with Nodebus Extenders are not yet resolved but we are making progress with Foxboro. If Frits has no more problems with DNBX connected stations, I assume his issue was caused by a ground loop lssue that the use of fiber eliminated. Tom VandeWater Control Systems Developer Analyst Dow Corning Corp. Carrollton, KY -----Original Message----- From: Brian Long [mailto:blong@xxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:23 PM To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [foxboro] DNBX Solution - foxboro site Tom / Fritz, In your opionions was this a good solution to your problems or do you still have issues with the DNBX's? Brian Long Arkansas Kraft -----Original Message----- From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of tom.vandewater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:49 AM To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [foxboro] DNBX Solution - foxboro site Frits, I really liked your ASCII ART and it came through with no problem for me. You are very creative. I have a little simpler solution that can eliminate the 5 port hub and UTP cabling that you mention. There are many Thinnet to Fiber Converters available that are the same form factor as the Fiber to AUI converter that you showed in your ART. I listed the first one that I found on the web at: http://www.visiostencils.com/home/visiostencils_desc.asp?selSten=LAN_Product s.vss&manufacturer=CanogaPerkins# Thinnet to Fiber Converter Unique EQID: CP010 Manufacturer: CanogaPerkins Equipment Type: Converter Product Line LAN Products Product Description: [8808]Thinnet to Fiber Converter Fiber to AUI Extender Unique EQID: CP008 Manufacturer: CanogaPerkins Equipment Type: Extender Product Line LAN Products Product Description: [8805]Fiber AUI Extender So here is another possible solution. ----- -------------- -------- ------- | D | | Thinnet RX|<--------|TX | | | | N | 3m | to Fiber | 150m |/ | 2m | SUN | | B |->thin->| Converter |->Fibre->|Optics|->AUI->| BOX | | X | | TX|-------->|RX | | | ----- -------------- -------- ------- We looked at grounding as a source of the problems that we were having with nodebus extenders which are similar to DNBX's. The original installation documents for nodebus extenders showed the thicknet shield or jacket grounded at each end. If the ground potential at each end of the thicknet was different, it allowed a continuous current flow from one building to the other across the shield of the thicknet coax. That current flow could induce interference/noise onto the center conducter. If this solution fixed your problem that is probably what was happening. In or case, even fiber optic nodebus extenders didn't solve the problem so we knew that grounding wasn't our issue. Tom VandeWater Control Systems Developer Analyst Dow Corning Corp. Carrollton, KY -----Original Message----- From: Schouten, Frits JF [mailto:Frits.Schouten@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 3:31 PM To: 'blong@xxxxxxx' Cc: Foxboro DCS Mail List (E-mail) Subject: Re: [foxboro] DNBX Solution - foxboro site With the wrapping of the lines I was afraid that a bit of confusion might happen. Okay, here we go: >From the DNBX I run a short piece of thin coax to one of those small 5 port hubs which has a thin net connection on the back. From one of the UTP connections on the hub I go to a utp to fibre converter. Now we're on fibre and go anyware we like, distance wise sort of. On the WP end I unplugged the aui connection from the ST500 (thick to aui converter) and connected the aui cable to the fibre converter. Circuit completed. We have lift off. All could have been a bit simpler with a 'thick to fibre' converter near the DNBX but we didn't have one . I'm actually not sure if they exist. Well, that's our solution to this very nagging DNBX problem. Cheers, Frits Schouten. BHP-NZSteel -----Original Message----- From: Brian Long [mailto:blong@xxxxxxx] Sent: Saturday, 15 March 2003 02:44 To: Frits.Schouten@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: DNBX Solution - foxboro site Fritz, Could you possibly go into a little more detail on your DNBX solution. I did not quite understand your diagram. Thanks in advance! Thanks, Brian Long E&I Superintendent Green Bay Packaging Arkansas Kraft Division 501-354-9205 EOM NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message. _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave EOM NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message. _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave