Re: [foxboro] Can't figure out a way to justify it.

  • From: brad.s.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:59:53 -0600

My two cents ... our corporate policy (as I read it) seems to be toward a
common platform in order to take advantage of shared services.  As long as
we're repairing, replacing or upgrading individual pieces, the cost pretty
much falls "under the radar".  I expect that as soon as I put in a project
with a price tag that triggers a higher level review, they will push VERY
hard to replace our I/A with H******** (which has a huge majority in the
installed base corporate-wide).

That said, I will continue to maintain my 51B/WP30/100 series for as long
as I can, upgrading individual components where necessary, and trying to
avoid the radar.

Brad Wilson
ExxonMobil Chemical Co
Edison Synthetics Plant
732-321-6115
732-321-6177 fax
Brad.S.Wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: