Re: [foxboro] AW: The ACCUM block saga continues...
- From: Corey R Clingo <clingoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 17:04:58 -0500
I don't think ACCUM is a valid parameter for the ACCUM block, but then
again, I am not in front of an I/A system at the moment, either.
Corey
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Warren Brown |
| | <bigwrb21@hotmail|
| | .com> |
| | Sent by: |
| | foxboro-bounce@fr|
| | eelists.org |
| | |
| | |
| | 06/06/2002 12:29 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to|
| | foxboro |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: foxboro
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: [foxboro] AW: The ACCUM block saga continues...
|
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
OK
what does omget return for the ACCUM param ?
wrb
>Yeah, what he said ;-)
>
>Omset is what requires the data type. Omget only takes 2 options, -a (for
>alias) or -v, the default (for variable). Unfortunately you can't use a
>data type argument to cast the returned value to another type.
>
>Corey
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
