Re: [foxboro] 8.5 Domain Controller

  • From: stan <stanb@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: andreas.weiss@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:52:27 -0400

On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 03:06:35PM +0200, andreas.weiss@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Russ,
> 
> > Security is a choice.
> > ...
> > For those not required to be compliant....load V8.5 unsecure and go on as
> usual...
> 
> we want a secure DCS environment. Do you really believe that installing a
> 8.5 Domain Controller increases the security? It depends on what you
> measure.
> 
> I think that putting additional load on the MESH network increases the
> unreliability of the network. It is good to read that Development will
> change this in V8.7.
> 
It's not just installing the DC. This (probably) could have been done W/O
DC's, but that really does not matter. Foxboro has chosen to implement
thier security model using DC's. This is probably the prefered M$ solution.
So, all of the security is ultimately implemented by policies that are set
up in the DC's.

It's these polices (and EPO) that enforce the security model.


-- 
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. foxboro
  3. Archive
  4. 08-2010