Re: [foxboro] 3rd Party products on windows.

  • From: "Hicks, Gaylon F." <gfhicks@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:40:07 -0500

Since this is Soapbox Day on the list server, move over David. My turn.

We are in the design part of the process of installing a lot of new
ZCP270/200 series hardware here on BFN Unit 1, FAT (hopefully) spring
2005.  The target I/A version is 8.0.  During initial discussions with
Foxboro I really pushed for a Sun/Unix AW on this system.  To make a
long story short, 8.0 will not support the 50 series boxes.  So, like it
or not (NOT!), I'm going to be the proud owner of an AW70.  The WP70s I
mind much less, because we don't use the CRTs as our primary operator
interface.  I really think we aren't far from a Windows Only I/A future.


The "I don't like Windows" viewpoint has been expressed at the Users
Groups meetings before, but we should be sure to do it this year also
(Remember the Alamo!). =20

I realize that the preceding mini-diatribe added nothing useful what so
ever to the world, but I feel better.

Gaylon Hicks=20



-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of David Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:17 AM
To: Foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] 3rd Party products on windows.


I have been very quiet on the Foxboro bashing for a very long time.  But
I=20
cannot let some of the recent threads go without weighing in.

There are problems that are inherent to windows, and there are problems=20
that are due to poor implementation, or obsolete third party products.
I=20
have heard Foxboro salespeople try to justify these as problems due to
the=20
frequency of product updates for windows, or the amount of testing
required=20
for each service pack etc. Where was Windows 2000? Not on I/A.  I have
also=20
had a salesman tell me that all these problems would be solved if we
(the=20
people who did not ask for the windows product to begin with) were
willing=20
to pay more (remember Windows =3D lower cost of ownership) so that they
(the=20
people selling the product) could do adequate testing to keep products
and=20
licenses up to date. That's crazy.

If Foxboro wants me to make the move to windows (without screaming about

it), they must at least base load a version, like XP, with the current
and=20
tested third party tools.  Security has to be a priority, not an=20
afterthought.  No longer should we accept products that are not up to
date,=20
or even supported on the OS that is being shipped coming from Foxboro.
MKS=20
toolkit was not up to date.  Exceed was not up to date. Installing other

applications (and that's why we are demanding windows right?) can have=20
disastrous DLL and/or registry conflicts.  Some of these issues may be=20
fixed in the newest release, I don't know.  I do know Foxboro,
Wonderware,=20
Rockwell Automation (kind of), Yokogawa and Emerson are all advising=20
against installing XP SP2 until further notice. So it appears that
Foxboro=20
is not alone with these issues. Of course, some of these problems occur
on=20
Solaris too, but the operating system releases are less frequent, third=20
party applications are fewer, and virus risks are fewer (but still
there).

If I'm going to commit to a windows based future, The vendors need to=20
commit to a high quality, robust system that has components that have
been=20
tested together.

David Johnson








"Quote me as saying I was misquoted."
Groucho Marx=20

=20
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe:      =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: