Heh. That's a philosophical thing you can look at two ways. While I agree with you, the way it has been explained to me is that they look at the volume of articles referenced from the web, they examine the top X percent, and update those. Apparently, with the number of articles involved, updating them all would represent a massive investment of time and effort, for little potential gain. -----Original Message----- From: Harondel J. Sibble [mailto:exchangelist@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 11:56 PM To: [ExchangeList] Subject: [exchangelist] RE: problems with outlook 2003 and secure pop3 http://www.MSExchange.org/ On 19 Dec 2005 at 23:01, Michael B. Smith wrote: > http://www.MSExchange.org/ > > The fact that the KB was first written for Outlook XP/2002 does not > minimize, one jot or tiddle, the fact that the regedit also applies to > Outlook 2003. Hmm, you'd think that they'd note it applies to Outlook 2003 as part of the KB article <sheesh>. Well the second kb article seems to have made a big change in my test environment, I'll wait for tomorrow when I hear back from the folks back east to see whether I also need to implement the outlook registry change. -- Harondel J. Sibble Sibble Computer Consulting Creating solutions for the small business and home computer user. help@xxxxxxxxx (use pgp keyid 0x3AD5C11D) http://www.pdscc.com (604) 739-3709 (voice/fax) (604) 686-2253 (pager) ------------------------------------------------------ List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp ------------------------------------------------------ Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites: http://www.techgenix.com ------------------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion List as: michael@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist Report abuse to info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx