RE: problems with outlook 2003 and secure pop3

  • From: "Michael B. Smith" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 05:56:03 -0500

Heh. That's a philosophical thing you can look at two ways.

While I agree with you, the way it has been explained to me is that they
look at the volume of articles referenced from the web, they examine the
top X percent, and update those. Apparently, with the number of articles
involved, updating them all would represent a massive investment of time
and effort, for little potential gain.

-----Original Message-----
From: Harondel J. Sibble [mailto:exchangelist@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 11:56 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: problems with outlook 2003 and secure pop3

On 19 Dec 2005 at 23:01, Michael B. Smith wrote:

> The fact that the KB was first written for Outlook XP/2002 does not
> minimize, one jot or tiddle, the fact that the regedit also applies to
> Outlook 2003.

Hmm, you'd think that they'd note it applies to Outlook 2003 as part of
KB article <sheesh>.

Well the second kb article seems to have made a big change in my test 
environment, I'll wait for tomorrow when I hear back from the folks back
to see whether I also need to implement the outlook registry change.

Harondel J. Sibble 
Sibble Computer Consulting
Creating solutions for the small business and home computer user.
help@xxxxxxxxx (use pgp keyid 0x3AD5C11D)
(604) 739-3709 (voice/fax)      (604) 686-2253 (pager)

List Archives:
Exchange Newsletters: 
Visit for more information about our other sites:
You are currently subscribed to this Discussion List as:
To unsubscribe visit
Report abuse to info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: