RE: mailbox store down
- From: "Steve Moffat" <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:30:40 -0400
Oh I agree with you there, mostly SAV managed by a workstation set up as
the admin server, and we use multi layer AV, but not on the exchange
servers, Exchange....nothing else.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Lara, Greg [mailto:GLara@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 3:25 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: mailbox store down
http://www.MSExchange.org/
I don't worry about my Exchange server becoming infected, I worry about
clients being infected via their mailbox. And many people prefer to
implement a multi-layer AV strategy, which includes scanning mail as it
reaches the mailbox store in addition to blocking malicious mail at the
gateway, because if you rely on only one source of protection, you're
putting a lot of trust in that single point of failure.
Greg Lara
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
---------------------------
This e-mail message may contain privileged, confidential and/or
proprietary information intended only for the person(s) named. If you
are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message, and any
attachments, and notify the sender by return e-mail. If you are not the
intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, disclosure or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
---------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Moffat [mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 2:14 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: mailbox store down
http://www.MSExchange.org/
Well I, and no doubt many others, would stay away from them. In fact I
do not install any AV products on Exchange servers. Servers are servers,
and therefore should not be at risk from mail borne viruses. And worms
should be caught at the gateway/firewall.
Steve
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Lara, Greg [mailto:GLara@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 12:38 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: mailbox store down
http://www.MSExchange.org/
Steve, some AV software makers require the file-level portion of their
product be installed to get the Exchange scanning as well. So, for some
of us, correctly configuring the file-level scanning is the only option.
Greg Lara
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
---------------------------
This e-mail message may contain privileged, confidential and/or
proprietary information intended only for the person(s) named. If you
are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message, and any
attachments, and notify the sender by return e-mail. If you are not the
intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, disclosure or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
---------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Moffat [mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 9:08 AM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: mailbox store down
http://www.MSExchange.org/
You say your not scanning inetpub...what about thee exchange directory.
File level AV should NOT be installed on an Exchange server.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: rubix cube [mailto:rubixc@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 4:21 AM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] mailbox store down
http://www.MSExchange.org/
On Saturday morning (first day of week here) the database is dismounted,
the following are the error messages, E002 is missing, and I search the
whole machine for it and its not there, virus scanner is setup
correctly, it doesn't scan inetpub and all storage drives and log
drives, and log file extensions, etc... all the folders and extensions
to exclude recommended by Microsoft, its the same database always (there
are multiple mailbox stores and storage groups), what could else be the
problem?
Of course it starts with missing the E002 and goes all the way to
dismounting the database.
What can I do to explain and workaround this?
thank you
rc
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com Leading
Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org Windows Security
Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/ Network Security Library:
http://www.secinf.net/ Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions:
http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org Discussion List as:
ExchangeMailingList@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe visit
http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This E-Mail is confidential. It is not intended to be read, copied, disclosed
or used by any person other than the recipient named above.
Unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. Optimum IT Solutions Ltd disclaims any liability for any action taken
in connection of this E-Mail. The comments or statements expressed in this
E-Mail are not necessarily those of Optimum IT Solutions Ltd or its
subsidiaries or affiliates.
administrator@xxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
