RE: Spam and A/V appliances.

  • From: "Deni Jakovljevic" <Deni.Jakovljevic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 09:59:49 +1100

Symantec Brightmail is quite good, very flexible in terms of how you
want to filter and manage spam, does antivirus, has some basic reports
if its something your looking for, can be linked into Exchange for
additional antispam flexibility, load distribution if your site is SMTP





From: John T (Lists) [mailto:johnlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, 6 January 2006 05:59 AM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Spam and A/V appliances.

FYI, all solutions are software based. It is just that some of them come
completely packaged into a self contained device. As such, those self
contained devices tend to cost more in terms of dollars but less in
terms of labor hours.


John T

eServices For You


-----Original Message-----
From: Evan Mann [mailto:emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:46 AM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] Spam and A/V appliances.

Hello all. I'm looking for input on an SMTP e-mail appliances for
spam/content filtering and antivirus.  I prefer an appliance over
software I run on a server, but I'll also accept input for software
based products.

My exchange front end does nothing but SMTP transport work, and A/V
scanning. It has no stores on it.  My current spam product runs on the
back end servers, because it uses SMTP Event Sink to pick off spam.
This means I have to let spam come to the back end server, causes
unnecessary load.  I want something to put all the way in front to
reduce these loads.

Two of the popular names in appliances are Ironmail and Barracuda, so
I'm obviously interested in those.  I'm also looking at St. Bernanrds
ePrism, as we have their iPrism already.

One of my absolute requirements is how spam is managed.  I must have
ability for end users to manage their spam and it's settings.  In
conjunction with global black/white lists Users must have the ability to
maintain their own (through web interface, directly in outlook,
whatever).  The user must be able to view the items in their quarantine.
The key to his is the USER has some control.  I cannot utilize a device
where an admin has to go digging through quarantines for legit mail, or
where an admin has to approve a mail from being released from the

Beyond that, I'm somewhat flexible.  I'll continue to use my Exchange
front end A/V, but I want some decent A/V functionality in the appliance
to reduce some scan load.

Based on this, can those of you who have used any of the boxes I've
mentioned, and others, provide input on if they would meet my
requirements, and what your experiences have been.

List Archives:
Exchange Newsletters: 
Visit for more information about our other sites:
You are currently subscribed to this Discussion List as:
To unsubscribe visit
Report abuse to info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

List Archives:
Exchange Newsletters: 
Visit for more information about our other sites:
You are currently subscribed to this Discussion List as:
To unsubscribe visit
Report abuse to info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 Insearch CRICOS Provider Code: 00859D
NSW Premier's Excellence in Exporting to China Award 2004
Australian Education Export Award 2003
NSW Premier's Education Export Award 2002 & 2003






This email message and any accompanying attachments may contain  
confidential information. If you are not the named and intended recipient,  
you must not read, use, copy, disclose, or distribute this message, any  
attachments, or the information contained in this message.  If you have  
received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the  
message immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of  
the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority,  
states them to be the views of Insearch Limited. There is no warranty that  
this message and any attachments are error or virus free. 




Other related posts: