[ExchangeList] Re: Restoring mailboxes in Exchange 2000/2003
- From: "Rick Boza" <rickb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:33:31 -0400
So...given that Russ is right - how is it not practical? I've
implemented Exchange more than a few times, and managing deleted item
retention effectively is always, ALWAYS better than doing a restore.
I'm a bit surprised you'd give such a response, Raj -from what I've
seen you often have pretty well thought out input. If that's your only
complaint about it, that seems a bit disingenuous to me.
Anyway, perhaps its personal preference - personally I advocate avoiding
restores whenever possible except in the case of disaster. Back to the
original topic: what are you asking exactly, and then maybe we can
provide a more meaningful answer.
From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Periyasamy, Raj
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:09 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: Restoring mailboxes in Exchange 2000/2003
Yes, you are right
________________________________
From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Russ Clark
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:55 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: Restoring mailboxes in Exchange 2000/2003
That is incorrect, you can recover from shift deletes if you have the
dumpsteralwayson registry hack enabled.
Russ Clark
________________________________
From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Periyasamy, Raj
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 8:45 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: Restoring mailboxes in Exchange 2000/2003
I don't think the Ed Crowley Never Restore method is really useful in
practical world. because, 90% of all restore requests are shift deletes.
Shift delete does not send the deleted item to dumpster. Its gone for
good immediately.
HTH.
Regards,
Raj Periyasamy
MCSE(Messaging), CCNA
________________________________
From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rick Boza
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:31 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: Restoring mailboxes in Exchange 2000/2003
I'm not clear on exactly what you are asking - is the question whether
or not his is viable? Absolutely. Is it optimal? No, that's why
Microsoft introduced the recovery storage group.
But a better solution is the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method (tm)
While it was originally designed around Exchange 5.5, the principles
remain valid through E2K7.
Rick
From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of MAHADEVAN
Subramanyan
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 3:31 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Restoring mailboxes in Exchange 2000/2003
Sorry Guys...Am posting this question again...
While surfing the net i got this info from one of the Microsoft site
which states that the exchange database can be restored in the different
exchange server with same Org name and Structure in different forest.
Here is the site
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/823176 (have a glimpse at Method 3)
Is it possible to restore an Exchange database from a backup in a
different Exchange recovery server (with same organization name,
administrative group & Storage group name) in a different Forest?
Plz give your suggestions... and also let me know if any one of you have
tried this and got succeeded....
Regards, Maha
MCSE: Messaging
Confidentiality Statement:
This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it
is addressed. It may contain privileged, confidential information which
is exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, please note that you are strictly prohibited from
disseminating or distributing this information (other than to the
intended recipient) or copying this information. If you have received
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return
email.
Confidentiality Statement:
This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it
is addressed. It may contain privileged, confidential information which
is exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, please note that you are strictly prohibited from
disseminating or distributing this information (other than to the
intended recipient) or copying this information. If you have received
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return
email.
Other related posts:
