RES: Re: Why 4 Procs
- From: "Tiago de Aviz" <Tiago@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:24:21 -0200
Get an used 4-processor ProLiant on eBay! There you go, everyone's happy =)
Tiago de Aviz
SoftSell - Curitiba
(41) 340-2363
www.softsell.com.br
Esta mensagem, incluindo seus anexos, tem caráter confidencial e seu conteúdo é
restrito ao destinatário da mensagem. Caso você tenha recebido esta mensagem
por engano, queira por favor retorná-la ao destinatário e apagá-la de seus
arquivos. Qualquer uso não autorizado, replicação ou disseminação desta
mensagem ou parte dela é expressamente proibido. A SoftSell não é responsável
pelo conteúdo ou a veracidade desta informação.
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Trung Le [mailto:trungle@xxxxxxxx]
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 28 de janeiro de 2005 03:32
Para: [ExchangeList]
Assunto: [exchangelist] Re: Why 4 Procs
http://www.MSExchange.org/
Hi,
I agree with you and Shawn about 2 CPUs. Personally, I don't think 4 CPUs
server is worth of money to spend! :-( Instead of one server, I can spend
money for at least two servers, then do the load balancing and fault
tolerance, which 1 server can't do! What happens if 1 server is down? The
other will pick up the load and users don't see much different. It may slow
down, but at least users can send/receive mail! ;-) In case of one 4-CPU
server, if it's down, there is no mail at all! ;-) Besides, if you have
two separate locations, then one 2-CPU at each location will provide users
faster service while reducing WAN bandwidth vs. one 4-CPU at one location!
;-)
Best,
P.S. unless like Shawn said, one has tons of money to spend for two 4-CPU
servers to do the load balancing and fault tolerance! :-)
Trung Le
----- Original Message -----
From: "C Drawers" <cdrawers@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 6:16 PM
Subject: [exchangelist] Re: Why 4 Procs
> http://www.MSExchange.org/
>
> Thanks for the article. I hadn't seen that.
>
> Unlike a lot of companies that can afford to do 4 way
> boxes, we are trying to ensure we're using money
> effectively. :)
> --- Danny <nocmonkey@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> http://www.MSExchange.org/
>>
>> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:45:45 -0800 (PST), C Drawers
>> <cdrawers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > 4 Processor servers seem to always been chosen for
>> mailbox servers. Since a
>> > comparable equipped 2 processor server is often
>> 1/4 the cost and it seems
>> > the latest 2 proc box has equivilant ghz power as
>> a 4 proc box, it sure
>> > seems like 2 proc boxes are the way to go.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Not sure if this is of any help:
>>
>>
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;827281
>>
>> > Any crazy theories or even better... concrete
>> theories with data to suppor
>> > the theory?
>>
>> Here's one: if you can afford it, the more the
>> better! :D
>>
>> ...D
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>> List Archives:
>>
> http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
>> Exchange Newsletters:
>> http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
>> Exchange FAQ:
>>
> http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>> Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
>> World of Windows Networking:
>> http://www.windowsnetworking.com
>> Leading Network Software Directory:
>> http://www.serverfiles.com
>> No.1 ISA Server Resource Site:
>> http://www.isaserver.org
>> Windows Security Resource Site:
>> http://www.windowsecurity.com/
>> Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/
>> Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions:
>> http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>> You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org
>> Discussion List as: CDrawers@xxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe visit
>>
> http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
>> Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.
> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
> Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
> Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
> World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com
> Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
> No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org
> Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
> Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/
> Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
> ------------------------------------------------------
> You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org Discussion List as:
> trungle@xxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
> Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com
Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org
Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/
Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org Discussion List as:
tiago@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
